This resolution recognizes that renewable energy facilities are the cheapest to operate and that reliance on fossil fuels drives up wholesale electricity prices.
Sheldon Whitehouse
Senator
RI
This resolution recognizes that renewable energy facilities are the cheapest to operate, while reliance on fossil fuel plants drives up wholesale electricity prices. It formally acknowledges that using the lowest-cost power sources first is standard practice in electricity markets. The bill highlights that increasing demand met by higher-cost fossil fuels directly leads to higher consumer prices.
This Senate resolution isn’t a new law, but it’s a formal, fact-based statement about how electricity markets actually work. It’s like a legislative body officially saying, “Hey, we’ve looked at the numbers, and here’s what’s happening.” The resolution specifically acknowledges two key economic findings: first, that facilities producing renewable electricity (think wind and solar) are the cheapest power plants to operate, and second, that relying on fossil fuel plants (coal, natural gas) to meet rising power demand is what drives up wholesale electricity prices.
To understand why this matters, you have to look at how power grids decide which plant to turn on next—a process called "dispatch order." The resolution confirms that the plants with the lowest operating costs are always used first. Why? Because that keeps the price down. Since wind and solar don't pay for fuel, their operating costs are near zero. The resolution states that when demand goes up, the grid has to fire up generators with higher operating costs, which are primarily the fossil fuel plants that have to pay for expensive fuel and maintenance. This reliance on high-cost generators is what pushes the wholesale price of power higher for everyone, ultimately impacting your monthly bill.
While this resolution doesn't mandate a single change, it sets a crucial economic premise for future policy debates. It formally recognizes that the path to lower wholesale electricity prices involves maximizing the use of near-zero operating cost renewables. For the average consumer, this is a big deal because it frames future energy discussions not just around environmental concerns, but around pure, hard economics. The resolution highlights that the U.S. demand for power is growing faster than it has in two decades, making the cost of meeting that growth critical. If the government acknowledges that using fossil fuels to cover this growth means higher prices, it puts pressure on policymakers to favor the cheaper option.
This resolution is great news for the renewable energy sector and for consumers hoping for stable, lower electricity costs. But it puts the spotlight squarely on the fossil fuel industry (coal, oil, and natural gas). By officially stating that their high operating costs are the direct cause of rising wholesale prices when demand peaks, the resolution provides a powerful economic argument against relying on these sources for future growth. While the resolution isn't regulatory, it’s a public, formal acknowledgment of the economic reality, and that reality is that the operational expense of burning fuel is a major driver of expense for everyone trying to keep their AC running in the summer.