This resolution recognizes the increase in climate change-driven extreme weather events alongside the dismantling of vital weather monitoring and alert systems.
Sheldon Whitehouse
Senator
RI
This resolution recognizes the increasing threat of climate change-driven extreme weather events while simultaneously noting significant staffing and budget cuts to critical weather monitoring systems like the National Weather Service. It formally acknowledges the link between climate change and severe weather, mourns recent losses of life, and stresses the urgent need to fully fund and staff essential weather safety infrastructure.
This isn’t a new law or a spending bill; it’s a Senate resolution formally recognizing specific findings about extreme weather, climate change, and the state of our national weather services. Think of it as a formal statement of facts the Senate agrees on, setting the stage for potential future action.
The resolution’s core is built on a few key findings. First, it establishes that climate change is causing and worsening extreme weather events. It cites scientific evidence showing that this means stronger hurricanes, more coastal flooding, and dangerously heavy rainfall that leads to life-threatening floods in both coastal and inland areas. This is the official acknowledgment that the weather isn't just 'weird'—it’s changing in ways that directly impact safety and property.
Crucially, the resolution then pivots to the agencies responsible for keeping us safe from these events. It notes that since January 2025, the National Weather Service (NWS) has lost over 550 employees, largely through layoffs and buyouts. It also points out that the administration has proposed cutting a staggering $2.2 billion from the budget of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which oversees the NWS. For regular people, these numbers translate directly to slower warnings, fewer localized forecasts, and potentially less accurate data when a storm is bearing down. If you’re a farmer relying on precise rainfall predictions or a construction worker needing a clear severe weather alert, these staffing and budget cuts hit close to home.
Based on those findings, the resolution makes three formal acknowledgments. First, it acknowledges that climate change is indeed driving and worsening life-threatening extreme weather events. Second, it formally mourns the loss of innocent lives to these events—a necessary, if somber, acknowledgment of the human cost. Finally, and perhaps most importantly for the future, it acknowledges the urgent need to fully fund and maintain weather monitoring and alert systems, and to ensure the National Weather Service is adequately staffed. This section is a direct signal that Congress recognizes the danger in cutting the resources needed to protect the public from the very threats the resolution just detailed.
Because this is a resolution and not a bill, it doesn't immediately change any laws, spend any money, or reverse those proposed budget cuts. It’s non-binding, meaning it’s a statement of intent, not an enforceable mandate. However, it’s a significant political move. When the Senate formally acknowledges that climate change is making our weather more dangerous and that the government is simultaneously gutting the agencies meant to warn us, it creates a powerful legislative foundation. It puts lawmakers on record, making it much harder to ignore calls for increased NWS funding or to continue pushing for the proposed NOAA cuts down the line. It’s the political equivalent of getting everyone in the room to agree on the problem before you start debating the solution.