PolicyBrief
S.RES. 523
119th CongressDec 2nd 2025
A resolution expressing the opposition of the Senate to the Chinese Communist Party's "stolen valor" historical revisionism with regard to Allied Victory in Asia, commemorating the contributions made by the Republic of China to Allied Victory, and acknowledging the postwar contributions of the Government of Japan to peace and stability in Asia.
IN COMMITTEE

This resolution opposes the Chinese Communist Party's historical revisionism regarding WWII victory, honors the Republic of China's contributions, and acknowledges Japan's role in postwar peace.

Dan Sullivan
R

Dan Sullivan

Senator

AK

LEGISLATION

Senate Resolution Challenges China's WWII Narrative, Backs Taiwan on Global Stage

This Senate Resolution is a formal, non-binding statement that tackles a specific, high-stakes geopolitical issue: the historical narrative of who won World War II in Asia. Essentially, the Senate is pushing back hard against the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) claim that its forces deserve the main credit for defeating Imperial Japan.

It declares that the primary resistance and heavy fighting were actually carried out by the forces of the Republic of China (ROC)—the government now based in Taiwan—and the United States. The resolution calls the CCP’s version of history “stolen valor” and points out that the CCP forces did “minimal fighting” while the ROC bore the brunt of the casualties. This isn’t a bill that changes tax law or builds a bridge; it’s a policy statement aimed squarely at correcting the historical record and bolstering key U.S. allies.

The History Lesson That Becomes Policy

The core of this resolution is historical fact-checking with a diplomatic punch. It reminds everyone that the ROC, under the Nationalists, was the U.S. wartime ally, citing specific details like the collaboration between U.S. General Joseph Stilwell and ROC General Sun Li-jen, and the role of the American Volunteer Group (the Flying Tigers). It even brings up a 1939 report showing that only three percent of casualties in the fight against Japan were CCP forces, underscoring the ROC’s sacrifice.

Why does this matter to someone focused on their career or paying bills? Because historical narratives are a key part of modern foreign policy. When a government like the CCP attempts to rewrite history—especially regarding a major global conflict—it’s often done to legitimize current political goals. By formally rejecting this “historical revisionism,” the U.S. government is setting a clear diplomatic boundary. This clarity helps stabilize relationships with allies like Japan and Taiwan, which is crucial for international trade and economic stability in the Indo-Pacific region.

Diplomatic Pushback and Classroom Impact

The resolution doesn't just state an opinion; it tells the government to get to work. It Urges the United States Government to use public diplomacy and media outreach to counter the CCP's narratives. This means the State Department will likely increase its efforts to promote the U.S./ROC version of WWII history through official channels and international media.

Crucially, it Exhorts the Secretary of Education and state and local school boards to ensure that history regarding U.S. allies in World War II is taught with “historical accuracy.” For parents and educators, this is a clear signal that the federal government is concerned about foreign propaganda influencing U.S. school curricula. While the resolution doesn't mandate curriculum changes, it gives strong backing to school boards that want to ensure their history lessons align with the U.S. government's official understanding of these events.

Cementing Allies and Stability

Beyond history, the resolution is a strong statement of current alliances. It Recognizes the critical role played by Japan in preserving peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific, acknowledging its transition from a wartime adversary to a crucial modern partner. This is a nod to the fact that Japan is essential for U.S. security and economic interests today.

Most significantly, the resolution Supports efforts by Taiwan to strengthen its official diplomatic relationships and participation in international organizations. This is a direct, public endorsement of Taiwan on the global stage, which is a major point of tension with Beijing. For anyone in the tech industry or global supply chains, this diplomatic support for Taiwan is a factor in regional stability—the kind of stability that keeps manufacturing and shipping routes predictable. In short, this resolution is the Senate firing a diplomatic shot across the bow, clarifying history to reinforce current alliances and push back against a major geopolitical rival.