This Senate resolution urges the Department of Agriculture to immediately use its contingency funds to finance the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) through November.
Jeff Merkley
Senator
OR
This Senate resolution urges the Department of Agriculture to immediately use its contingency funds and interchange authority to ensure the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is fully financed. The Senate asserts the administration has a legal obligation to use these existing resources to support millions of vulnerable Americans through November. This measure expresses a position and does not enact new law.
This resolution, coming from the Senate, is essentially a very strong piece of advice—a “sense of the Senate”—directed at the Department of Agriculture (USDA). It demands that the USDA immediately use its existing contingency funds and interchange authority to fully finance the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), commonly known as food stamps, through November 2025. The core message is that the administration has a legal obligation and the necessary funds right now to keep food on the table for millions of Americans, and they need to use them.
This isn’t a new law or a budget appropriation; it’s the Senate pointing to the fine print and saying, “You have the money, use it.” The resolution asserts that the administration has the legal authority to tap into existing contingency funds to cover any potential shortfall in SNAP funding. Why is this a big deal? Because SNAP is a lifeline. The resolution specifically calls out the stakes: roughly 16 million children, 8 million seniors, 4 million people with disabilities, and 1.2 million veterans rely on these benefits to supplement their grocery budgets.
Think about the single parent working two jobs whose SNAP benefits cover the difference between a full fridge and an empty one. Or the elderly couple on a fixed income who depend on that monthly deposit to afford fresh produce. A funding lapse for even one month, like the one specified for November 2025, would mean immediate, painful choices at the grocery store for millions of families. This resolution is designed to prevent that scenario by forcing the issue—telling the USDA to use the tools already in its legal toolkit.
For anyone currently receiving SNAP, this resolution acts as a legislative safety net. It’s the Senate using its voice to affirm that those benefits should not, and legally do not have to, stop. The language is clear and focused on an urgent timeline: the administration must immediately use its authority to fund SNAP in November 2025. While a “sense of the Senate” resolution isn't legally binding—meaning it doesn't force the USDA’s hand like a law would—it sends an unmistakable political signal that Congress expects the administration to prioritize food security.
This move highlights the importance of often-overlooked government mechanisms like contingency funds and interchange authority. These are the financial cushions and accounting flexibility that allow agencies to shift money around to cover essential, mandatory programs when budget estimates fall short. By specifically naming these tools, the Senate is demanding a practical, administrative solution to keep the program running without interruption, ensuring that the people who need assistance the most don't have to worry about whether their benefits will show up next month.