This resolution urges Congress to protect Medicare from the hundreds of billions of dollars in automatic spending cuts triggered by H.R. 1.
Sheldon Whitehouse
Senator
RI
This resolution urges Congress to protect Medicare from severe, automatic spending cuts triggered by recent legislation that significantly increased the national deficit. These mandated cuts threaten to slash hundreds of billions from the program, jeopardizing essential healthcare for millions of seniors and people with disabilities. The resolution emphasizes that Americans earned these benefits and they should not be subject to reckless, across-the-board reductions.
This Senate resolution is essentially a formal alarm bell about a massive, automatic budget threat looming over Medicare. The issue stems from a separate bill (H.R. 1) that the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects will increase the national deficit by a staggering $4.1 trillion between 2025 and 2034. Because of a 2010 law called Statutory Pay-As-You-Go (S-PAYGO), that huge deficit increase triggers mandatory, indiscriminate spending cuts—known as sequestration—to offset the cost. The resolution’s core message is clear: these cuts are coming for Medicare, and they need to be stopped.
When the CBO flagged that $4.1 trillion deficit increase, it kicked S-PAYGO into action. This law doesn’t care about the difference between essential services and discretionary spending; it just demands cuts. And Medicare, which covers over 67 million Americans, is not exempt. The resolution highlights the grim numbers: $45 billion is set to be automatically slashed from Medicare funding in 2026 alone, with the total cut reaching an eye-watering $536 billion through 2034. This is on top of nearly $1 trillion in other proposed healthcare reductions mentioned in the resolution, which could strip coverage from 15 million people.
For regular folks, this isn't just budget jargon; it’s a direct threat to the healthcare infrastructure they rely on. Medicare payments are the lifeblood for hospitals, community health centers, and doctors who treat seniors and people with disabilities. Imagine you live in a rural area, and your local hospital depends heavily on Medicare reimbursements. If those payments suddenly drop by tens of billions, that hospital might have to close wings, cut staff, or even shut down entirely. This is the real-world impact of sequestration: reduced access to care, longer wait times, and financial instability for the providers who keep the system running.
This resolution emphasizes a fundamental point: people paid into Medicare their entire working lives, expecting those benefits to be there when they retired. The Senate is stating that these earned benefits should not be subject to “reckless, across-the-board cuts” triggered by a separate piece of legislation. The resolution serves as a political and legislative push to shield Title XVIII of the Social Security Act (Medicare) from the budget reconciliation bill passed in 2025. While the resolution itself doesn't enact a fix, it formally signals Congress's intent to find a way to protect seniors and the healthcare system from this massive, incoming fiscal hit.