PolicyBrief
S.RES. 351
119th CongressJul 31st 2025
A resolution requesting information on the Kingdom of Eswatini's human rights practices pursuant to section 502B(c) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961.
IN COMMITTEE

This resolution demands the Secretary of State promptly report to Congress on the Kingdom of Eswatini's human rights practices, particularly concerning non-U.S. citizens removed there by the U.S. government.

Timothy "Tim" Kaine
D

Timothy "Tim" Kaine

Senator

VA

LEGISLATION

U.S. Demands 30-Day Report on Eswatini Human Rights, Focusing on Treatment of Removed Non-Citizens

This resolution is essentially Congress telling the State Department, “We need the receipts, and we need them fast.” Specifically, it asks the Secretary of State to produce a comprehensive report on the human rights situation in the Kingdom of Eswatini and deliver it to key Congressional committees within 30 days of the resolution passing. The main goal here is transparency and oversight, especially regarding people the U.S. government has removed (deported) to Eswatini.

The 30-Day Deep Dive on Due Process

The core of the resolution focuses on the treatment of non-U.S. citizens removed to Eswatini by the United States. It’s not just asking about general human rights; it demands specifics on whether these individuals face arbitrary arrests, torture, unlawful killings, or human trafficking. Think of it as a detailed audit of the U.S. government’s removal process: Did the person get due process? Were they detained unlawfully? The resolution requires the State Department to describe whether those removed individuals were given a real chance to challenge their detention or removal, which goes straight to the heart of constitutional fairness, even when dealing with international removals.

Following the Money and the People

Beyond individual cases, the resolution requires two major assessments that affect U.S. foreign policy and taxpayer dollars. First, the State Department must assess the risk that U.S. security assistance—money and equipment—might be supporting Eswatini officials who are involved in abusing or detaining the very people the U.S. sent there. This is a critical check to ensure U.S. aid isn’t indirectly funding human rights violations. Second, the State Department must disclose all agreements and financial arrangements between the U.S. and Eswatini related to the removal, detention, or imprisonment of these non-citizens. This lifts the curtain on the operational side of international removals, ensuring Congress knows exactly what deals are being made.

The Real-World Impact: Accountability

For regular people, this resolution is primarily about accountability and oversight. It forces the Executive Branch to document and justify its actions in a sensitive area of foreign policy. If you care about how your government uses its power internationally—especially when it involves sending people to countries where their safety is questionable—this report is designed to give Congress the data needed to hold the administration accountable. It requires the State Department to detail all the assurances it sought from Eswatini about humane treatment before removals occurred, and what steps the U.S. is taking to bring back anyone who was wrongfully removed in compliance with U.S. court orders. While a 30-day deadline for such a detailed report is aggressive and might strain resources at the State Department, the urgency reflects Congress's desire for immediate, fact-based information to inform future policy decisions.