PolicyBrief
S.RES. 133
119th CongressMar 24th 2025
A resolution expressing support for the local public K-12 schools of the United States and condemning any actions that would defund public education or weaken or dismantle the Department of Education.
IN COMMITTEE

Expresses support for public K-12 schools and condemns actions to defund public education or weaken the Department of Education.

Adam Schiff
D

Adam Schiff

Senator

CA

LEGISLATION

Senate Resolution Backs Public K-12 Schools, Condemns Defunding Efforts and DOE Dismantling

This Senate resolution serves as a formal statement of support for the nation's public K-12 schools and the federal Department of Education (DOE). It explicitly acknowledges the DOE's role in channeling resources and support to millions of students, including those with disabilities (over 7.5 million), from low-income families (impacting over 51,000 schools), experiencing homelessness (nearly 1.4 million), and English language learners (over 5 million), among others. The core purpose is to affirm the value of public education and the federal infrastructure supporting it.

Standing Firm on Funding

The resolution puts the Senate on record strongly backing federal funding for public K-12 education. It emphasizes that this investment is crucial for school success and explicitly opposes diverting these public funds to private K-12 schools through voucher programs. Think of it as reinforcing the current system where federal dollars are primarily directed towards public institutions that serve the vast majority of students.

Defending the Department

Beyond funding, the resolution condemns any potential moves—whether through executive action or legislation—aimed at weakening the public education system. This includes specific actions like dismantling the DOE itself, eliminating or relocating major DOE offices, cutting federal education budgets, blocking significant federal education grants (like Title I for low-income schools or IDEA for students with disabilities), or pushing the financial burden of education entirely onto state and local governments. It's essentially drawing a protective circle around the DOE and the flow of federal aid to public schools, signaling opposition to drastic changes that could undermine established support structures for students and educators nationwide.