This joint resolution disapproves the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement's rule regarding the "Restoration of Names That Honor American Greatness; Gulf of America."
Sheldon Whitehouse
Senator
RI
This joint resolution expresses Congress's formal disapproval of a specific rule submitted by the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement regarding the "Restoration of Names That Honor American Greatness; Gulf of America." Through this action, Congress nullifies the agency's rule, preventing it from having any legal effect.
This joint resolution is a legislative veto. It uses the Congressional Review Act (CRA)—a specific, fast-track process—to formally disapprove and void a rule recently submitted by the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE). Specifically, Congress is targeting the BSEE rule titled "Restoration of Names That Honor American Greatness; Gulf of America," which was published in the Federal Register (90 Fed. Reg. 44322). The bottom line: this resolution ensures that BSEE’s new naming rule for the Gulf region has zero legal force or effect.
Think of the CRA as Congress hitting the 'reset' button on a specific regulation. When an executive agency like BSEE finalizes a rule, Congress has a limited window to review it. If both the House and Senate pass a resolution of disapproval, and the President signs it (or Congress overrides a veto), the rule is nullified. This resolution is the legislative branch saying, "Thanks, but no thanks," to the BSEE’s attempt to change the naming conventions in the Gulf of America.
For the average person, this bill doesn't change much directly, but it’s a big deal for how regulations are made. The BSEE is responsible for safety and environmental oversight of offshore energy operations, including oil and gas drilling. Their rule was focused on restoring or changing names related to the Gulf. By voiding the rule, this resolution essentially locks the current, pre-BSEE-rule naming status quo in place. Any entity—whether it’s a mapping company, an environmental group, or an energy company—that preferred the previous names or opposed the BSEE’s specific 'Restoration of Names' rule is the immediate beneficiary.
This action highlights Congress’s power to micromanage the executive branch. While the CRA is a legal mechanism designed for oversight, using it to overturn a rule about naming conventions—which is a relatively minor, symbolic regulatory action—shows that Congress is paying attention to even the small details. The immediate impact is that BSEE has wasted time and resources drafting a rule that is now dead on arrival. Furthermore, the CRA has a unique feature: once a rule is disapproved, the agency cannot issue a substantially similar rule in the future, meaning this naming issue is now effectively off the table for BSEE unless Congress changes the underlying law.