PolicyBrief
S.J.RES. 9
119th CongressJan 30th 2025
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission relating to "Commission Guidance Regarding the Listing of Voluntary Carbon Credit Derivative Contracts".
IN COMMITTEE

This resolution nullifies the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's guidance on listing voluntary carbon credit derivative contracts. By disapproving the rule, Congress prevents it from taking legal effect.

John Kennedy
R

John Kennedy

Senator

LA

LEGISLATION

Congress Nixes CFTC's Carbon Credit Derivatives Rule: What It Means for the Market

This joint resolution throws out the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's (CFTC) guidance on how voluntary carbon credit derivative contracts should be listed. Basically, Congress is hitting the brakes on the CFTC's attempt to regulate this emerging corner of the carbon market (89 Fed. Reg. 83378). The resolution uses the Congressional Review Act to completely nullify the CFTC's rule, meaning it's as if the guidance was never issued.

Scrapping the Rulebook

The now-defunct CFTC guidance aimed to set standards for exchanges listing voluntary carbon credit derivatives. These contracts are essentially bets on the future price of carbon offsets, which are used by companies to 'cancel out' their emissions. The guidance covered things like contract terms, risk management, and how to prevent market manipulation. By scrapping these rules, Congress is opting for a more hands-off approach.

Real-World Ripple Effects

So, what does this mean in practice? Imagine a farmer using carbon sequestration techniques to generate carbon credits. They might want to sell futures contracts based on those credits to hedge against price drops. Without clear rules, the market for these contracts could become less predictable and potentially riskier. On the flip side, a trading firm might find it easier to create and list new types of carbon credit derivatives without jumping through as many regulatory hoops. This could lead to more innovation, but also potentially more opportunities for shady dealings if there is not enough oversight.

The disapproval could also have a chilling effect on the development of a robust voluntary carbon market. Clear rules of the road are often seen as essential for attracting serious investment. Without them, some players might hesitate to get involved. The resolution comes down to a fundamental disagreement: how much should the government regulate these new markets to ensure they're fair and effective, versus allowing more freedom for market-driven solutions?

Navigating Uncharted Waters

This move also ties into existing laws around commodities trading, like the Commodity Exchange Act. The CFTC's guidance was meant to clarify how that law applies to these new carbon credit derivatives. Now, that's all up in the air again. One major challenge is that without clear definitions and standards, it is harder to prevent things like 'greenwashing' or double-counting of carbon credits. This creates uncertainty for everyone involved, from the companies buying offsets to the exchanges listing the contracts.