This joint resolution disapproves and nullifies the EPA's final rule that extended compliance deadlines for emissions standards in the oil and natural gas sector.
Adam Schiff
Senator
CA
This joint resolution expresses Congress's disapproval of the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) final rule that extended compliance deadlines for pollution standards in the Oil and Natural Gas Sector. By invoking the Congressional Review Act, this measure immediately nullifies the EPA's rule, preventing it from taking legal effect. Essentially, Congress is overturning the EPA's decision to delay stricter emissions requirements for oil and gas operations.
This joint resolution is Congress stepping in to hit the emergency brake on a specific rule recently finalized by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Think of it like this: the EPA put out a new rule, and Congress is using a legislative tool called the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to say, “Nope, send that back.”
So, what exactly did the EPA rule do? It dealt with the Oil and Natural Gas Sector and concerned performance standards and emissions guidelines. Essentially, the EPA rule was about extending the deadlines for when oil and gas operations—whether they were new, rebuilt, or existing facilities—had to meet certain pollution control standards. We are talking about the rules governing how much pollution these facilities can emit. The EPA had just published this rule (at 90 Fed. Reg. 35966) that essentially gave the industry more time to comply with environmental protections.
This joint resolution immediately cancels the EPA’s deadline extension rule. The bill text is clear: the rule “shall have no force or effect.” For the average person, this means that the regulatory clock Congress thought was ticking for oil and gas companies to clean up their act is back on track. The deadlines for implementing pollution controls—like reducing methane leaks or other emissions—will not be pushed back, as the EPA had intended. This effectively maintains a stricter, faster timeline for environmental compliance than the EPA’s recently proposed delay.
For the Oil and Natural Gas Sector, this means any relief or flexibility the EPA offered regarding compliance deadlines is now gone. They must adhere to the original, likely tighter, schedule for installing necessary pollution control equipment and meeting emissions targets. This could translate to higher immediate compliance costs for these businesses.
For communities near oil and gas operations and the general public concerned with air quality, this resolution is a win for faster environmental protection. By canceling the deadline extension, the resolution ensures that pollution controls, which are designed to improve air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, are implemented sooner rather than later. If you live downwind from a drilling site, this action means the regulatory protections intended to keep the air cleaner are less likely to be delayed.
This move highlights a core tension in policy: the balance between industry compliance timelines and the pace of environmental protection. By using this legislative veto, Congress is prioritizing the maintenance of existing regulatory timelines over administrative flexibility for the industry, ensuring that environmental standards move forward without the delay the EPA had proposed.