PolicyBrief
S.J.RES. 46
119th CongressApr 4th 2025
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine Pollution Control Standards; Heavy-Duty Vehicle and Engine Emission Warranty and Maintenance Provisions; Advanced Clean Trucks; Zero Emission Airport Shuttle; Zero-Emission Power Train Certification; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision".
IN COMMITTEE

This resolution disapproves and nullifies the EPA's rule that granted California the authority to set its own vehicle emission standards and related regulations.

Deb Fischer
R

Deb Fischer

Senator

NE

LEGISLATION

Resolution Blocks EPA Rule Allowing California's Stricter Truck Emission Standards

This joint resolution disapproves a specific Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule, effectively stopping it from going into effect. The rule in question, published as 88 Fed. Reg. 20688, granted California the authority to implement its own, stricter-than-federal standards for motor vehicle emissions, including regulations for heavy-duty trucks, zero-emission airport shuttles, and advanced clean truck initiatives.

Undoing California's Green Light

The EPA rule essentially gave California a waiver to set higher environmental bars for vehicles sold within its borders, covering things like emission warranty requirements and zero-emission powertrain certifications. This is significant because, historically, other states often choose to adopt California's stricter standards. By disapproving this specific EPA decision, the resolution prevents California from enforcing these particular advanced clean air regulations. This means the status quo, likely federal standards, remains the ceiling for these specific programs, rather than California's more ambitious targets.

The Ripple Effect on Roads and Regulations

Blocking these California-specific rules has tangible consequences. On one hand, vehicle and engine manufacturers might face less complex or costly compliance burdens, as they wouldn't need to meet a separate, potentially tougher set of standards for California (and any states that follow suit) regarding these specific initiatives like the Advanced Clean Trucks rule. This could translate to more uniform vehicle models and potentially fewer immediate cost increases passed on to buyers.

However, disapproving the rule also means a potential setback for efforts to accelerate the adoption of cleaner heavy-duty vehicles and reduce transportation-related air pollution, particularly in urban centers and near major freight corridors where air quality is a significant concern. Initiatives aimed at zero-emission airport shuttles and certifying zero-emission powertrains under the California framework are halted. This action maintains regulatory uniformity across states for these specific rules but removes a key mechanism California (and potentially other states) planned to use to push for faster technological shifts in the vehicle market towards lower emissions.