PolicyBrief
S.J.RES. 24
119th CongressFeb 25th 2025
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Rubber Tire Manufacturing".
IN COMMITTEE

This resolution nullifies the EPA's rule on national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants in rubber tire manufacturing.

Tim Scott
R

Tim Scott

Senator

SC

LEGISLATION

EPA Rule on Tire Manufacturing Air Pollution Gets Axed: Joint Resolution Nixes New Standards

This joint resolution throws out a recent EPA rule aimed at limiting hazardous air pollutants from rubber tire manufacturing. Published in the Federal Register on 94886 (89 Fed. Reg. 94886), this rule is now effectively canceled.

What's Tossed Out?

The scrapped EPA rule was designed to set national emission standards for dangerous air pollutants released during tire production. By disapproving this rule, the joint resolution essentially maintains the status quo, potentially allowing higher levels of these pollutants than the EPA deemed safe. This impacts every community, but it hits hardest where these manufacturing plants operate.

Real-World Rollback

For folks living near tire manufacturing facilities, this could mean a continued exposure to higher levels of hazardous air pollutants. Think of it like this: you're trying to clean up your house (the air), and someone just unplugged your vacuum (the EPA rule). The immediate effect? The dust (pollutants) doesn't get cleaned up. For a plant worker, or the family down the street, this might mean dealing with the same air quality issues they had before the rule was introduced.

The Bigger Picture

This move sits within a larger context of environmental regulation. The EPA's now-defunct rule was presumably put in place to protect public health and the environment from specific, known pollutants, as part of their mandate. Without it, there's a risk of increased air pollution, potentially undermining long-term public health and environmental goals. This fits a pattern where immediate compliance costs for businesses are being prioritized over broader environmental protections.

The Kicker

While manufacturers might see some short-term cost savings from not having to implement the new pollution controls, the potential long-term costs—both in terms of public health and environmental damage—could be significant. It's like deciding not to change your car's oil to save a few bucks now; you might save initially, but you're risking bigger problems down the road. The challenge now is figuring out how to balance manufacturing needs with clean air, and this resolution doesn't offer a solution—it just removes one.