PolicyBrief
S.J.RES. 21
119th CongressFeb 20th 2025
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to Israel of certain defense articles and services.
IN COMMITTEE

This resolution seeks to block the sale of specific U.S. defense articles and services, including bombs and guidance kits, to Israel. It expresses congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale.

Bernard "Bernie" Sanders
I

Bernard "Bernie" Sanders

Senator

VT

LEGISLATION

US to Halt Sale of Specific Bombs and Munitions to Israel Under New Joint Resolution

This joint resolution puts a hard stop on the sale of certain US military equipment to Israel. Specifically, it blocks the transfer of thousands of bombs and related tech, including GBU-39B Small Diameter Bombs, MK 82 500-pound bomb bodies, and various Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) Guidance Kits (like the KMU-556 and KMU-557 series for different bomb bodies). Also on the தடை list: over 17,000 FMU-152 and FMU-139 fuzes, plus a bunch of bomb components and support equipment.

Weapons on Hold

The resolution directly targets specific items: 2,166 GBU-39B Small Diameter Bombs, 2,800 MK 82 bomb bodies, and a whole range of JDAM Guidance Kits (KMU-556, KMU-557, KMU-572 series) that turn 'dumb' bombs into precision-guided munitions. Think of JDAM kits as the brains that steer a bomb to its target. The resolution also nixes the sale of thousands of FMU-152 and FMU-139 fuzes, which are essential for making these bombs go boom. This isn't about small arms; it's about heavy-duty weaponry often used in large-scale military operations.

Real-World Impact: From Factory to Field

For the folks assembling these weapons in US factories, this could mean a shift in production. Orders might slow down, or they might pivot to making different kinds of munitions. On the ground in the Middle East, this could change how conflicts play out. With fewer of these specific bombs available, Israel's military might have to rethink its strategies. For civilians in conflict zones, this could mean a reduction in the use of these particular weapons, potentially lowering the risk to non-combatants. For example, a farmer near a potential conflict zone might see a decreased risk of these specific types of bombs being used, affecting their safety and livelihood.

The Big Picture: Shifting Sands

This move could signal a shift in the long-standing military relationship between the US and Israel. It might push Israel to seek weapons from other sources or develop its own. It also raises questions about how the US balances its alliances with its stance on human rights and international conflict. While this resolution aims to address concerns about the use of these weapons, it also has the potential to shake up the US-Israel dynamic and could have ripple effects across the defense industry and international relations.