PolicyBrief
S.J.RES. 180
119th CongressApr 13th 2026
A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.
IN COMMITTEE

This joint resolution directs the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from unauthorized hostilities against Iran unless Congress declares war or provides specific authorization.

Chris Van Hollen
D

Chris Van Hollen

Senator

MD

LEGISLATION

Congress Moves to Pull U.S. Troops from Iran Hostilities: New Resolution Reasserts War Powers Authority

This joint resolution serves as a formal 'stop' sign from Congress to the executive branch regarding the ongoing military conflict with Iran. Citing the U.S. Constitution’s mandate that only Congress has the power to declare war, the bill directs the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from any hostilities within or against Iran that have not been specifically authorized by a vote in the Capitol. The measure specifically references 'Operation Epic Fury,' which began on February 28, 2026, and notes that as of April 8, 2026, the conflict has already resulted in 13 U.S. service members killed and 380 wounded. By invoking the War Powers Resolution and the Department of State Authorization Act, Congress is attempting to force a withdrawal unless a formal declaration of war or a specific authorization for use of military force (AUMF) is passed.

Drawing a Line in the Sand

The core of this bill is about who gets to decide when the country goes to war. For anyone with a family member currently deployed or in the reserves, this is a major shift in how the current conflict is managed. Under Section 2, the President is ordered to pull back troops from active hostilities. This isn't just a suggestion; it’s a directive based on the fact that Congress never gave the green light for a full-scale fight. For the average person, this means the legislative branch is trying to hit the brakes on a conflict that has been escalating through executive orders and presidential statements about targeting civilian infrastructure or deploying ground forces. It essentially says that if the mission is going to continue, it needs a public debate and a formal vote in D.C. first.

The Defensive Safety Net

While the bill calls for a withdrawal from active 'hostilities,' it includes several specific 'carve-outs' to ensure the U.S. isn't left completely vulnerable. Under the 'What the Directive Does Not Prevent' clause, the military can still defend itself, its personnel, and its facilities from direct attacks. It also allows for the continued collection and sharing of intelligence with partners who have been attacked by Iran since the end of February. For U.S. citizens living or working abroad, the bill explicitly protects the military’s ability to assist in their security and evacuation. This means that while the 'offensive' war effort is being reined in, the infrastructure for self-defense and rescue remains fully operational.

Real-World Stakes and Logistics

This resolution creates a clear legal framework for how the U.S. handles its presence in the region moving forward. For a software engineer in Seattle or a mechanic in Ohio, the impact is felt in the potential de-escalation of a costly and high-stakes conflict. By requiring expedited procedures under Section 1013 of the Department of State Authorization Act, the bill ensures this isn't something that can be easily buried in committee; it demands a timely response. The challenge, of course, lies in the transition—shifting from an active 'hostility' posture back to a purely 'defensive' one while still supporting partner nations with materiel and intelligence as outlined in the text. It’s a delicate balance between stopping an unauthorized war and maintaining regional stability.