This joint resolution disapproves the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection's final rule concerning overdraft lending by very large financial institutions.
Tim Scott
Senator
SC
This joint resolution expresses Congress's disapproval of the recent rule finalized by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (BCFP) concerning overdraft lending practices at very large financial institutions. By passing this resolution, Congress is effectively vetoing and preventing the enforcement of that specific BCFP regulation.
| Party | Total Votes | Yes | No | Did Not Vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Democrat | 258 | 0 | 255 | 3 |
Republican | 273 | 269 | 2 | 2 |
Independent | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
This joint resolution is Congress stepping in to hit the 'undo' button on a specific consumer protection rule. The target is a new regulation from the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (BCFP) that dealt with overdraft lending—specifically at the Very Large Financial Institutions (think the biggest banks out there). By passing this resolution, Congress is formally disapproving that rule, meaning it will not go into effect and cannot be enforced.
To understand the impact, you have to know what the BCFP rule was trying to do. While the full text of the cancelled rule isn't detailed here, we know it was meant to regulate overdraft practices for the giants of the banking world. Overdraft fees are a huge source of revenue for these institutions, often hitting consumers—especially those living paycheck to paycheck—hardest. This resolution essentially blocks a federal effort to rein in those fees or change how large banks structure their overdraft services. For consumers, this means the current system of overdraft lending, and the associated fees, remains in place at the nation's largest financial institutions.
This move has immediate, clear winners and losers. The big winners are the Very Large Financial Institutions themselves. They avoid the compliance costs and potential revenue loss that the BCFP rule would have imposed. For instance, if the rule limited the number of times a bank could charge an overdraft fee in a month, or capped the fee amount, those potential limits are now off the table. This is a direct benefit to the financial sector.
The losers are the consumers the BCFP rule was designed to protect. If you’ve ever had a $5 coffee purchase turn into a $35 overdraft fee because your balance was slightly off, you know the sting. The BCFP is an agency tasked with protecting consumers, and Congress using this legislative tool to overturn their work on a consumer finance issue is a significant assertion of oversight. It essentially prioritizes regulatory stability and the financial health of large banks over a specific, proposed consumer protection measure.