This joint resolution disapproves the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network’s final rule regarding anti-money laundering regulations for residential real estate transfers.
Mike Lee
Senator
UT
This joint resolution disapproves the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network’s (FinCEN) final rule regarding anti-money laundering regulations for residential real estate transfers. By passing this resolution, the rule is rendered null and void, preventing it from taking legal effect.
This joint resolution moves to officially strike down a recent rule from the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) that would have mandated new anti-money laundering (AML) protocols for residential real estate transfers. By invoking the Congressional Review Act, the resolution ensures that the rule published at 89 Federal Register 70258 has no legal force or effect, effectively halting a new layer of federal oversight in the housing market.
The blocked rule would have required professionals involved in real estate closings—like title insurance companies, attorneys, and settlement agents—to collect and report specific information about non-financed residential purchases. For a typical homebuyer or seller, this resolution means avoiding the additional paperwork, potential delays, and increased closing costs that often follow new federal reporting mandates. By stopping the rule, the resolution keeps the current status quo for residential transactions, preventing the introduction of complex 'know your customer' requirements that are usually reserved for banks.
For those working in the industry, from independent title agents to real estate attorneys, this move eliminates the need to build out new compliance systems. Under the now-blocked FinCEN rule, these professionals would have been responsible for identifying the 'beneficial owners' of legal entities buying property, a process designed to catch bad actors but one that adds significant administrative hours to every transaction. The resolution ensures that small real estate businesses aren't saddled with the costs of acting as de facto federal investigators, keeping the focus on the transfer of property rather than financial surveillance.