This resolution disapproves and nullifies the Environmental Protection Agency's rule on phasing down hydrofluorocarbons, as outlined in "Phasedown of Hydrofluorocarbons: Management of Certain Hydrofluorocarbons and Substitutes Under the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020".
Roger Marshall
Senator
KS
This joint resolution seeks to nullify the Environmental Protection Agency's rule concerning the phasedown of hydrofluorocarbons, specifically targeting the management of certain hydrofluorocarbons and their substitutes as outlined in the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020. By disapproving the rule, the resolution aims to prevent its enforcement and implementation.
This joint resolution throws out the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) rule on phasing down hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), titled "Phasedown of Hydrofluorocarbons: Management of Certain Hydrofluorocarbons and Substitutes Under the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020" (89 Fed. Reg. 82682). Basically, it kills a rule designed to reduce the use of these potent greenhouse gases.
The EPA's now-defunct rule was all about managing and reducing HFCs—powerful greenhouse gases often used in refrigeration and air conditioning—as part of the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020. By scrapping this, the resolution essentially says, "never mind" to those planned reductions.
Without the EPA's rule, businesses that use or make HFCs won't have to switch to more climate-friendly alternatives as quickly. Think about:
While this might keep costs down in the short term, it could mean bigger problems down the line. We're talking about potentially higher greenhouse gas emissions and a slower shift to more sustainable technologies. For the average person, this could translate to a longer timeline for dealing with the impacts of climate change, like more extreme weather and higher energy costs in the long run.
This move essentially hits the pause button on efforts to cut down on HFCs, which are known to be way more potent than carbon dioxide when it comes to global warming. It also raises questions about how serious we are about meeting climate goals and international agreements on reducing greenhouse gases. It's like deciding to keep driving a gas-guzzler instead of switching to an electric vehicle because it's cheaper upfront, ignoring the long-term costs to your wallet and the environment.