PolicyBrief
S.J.RES. 14
119th CongressFeb 5th 2025
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Phasedown of Hydrofluorocarbons: Management of Certain Hydrofluorocarbons and Substitutes Under the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020".
IN COMMITTEE

This resolution disapproves and nullifies the Environmental Protection Agency's rule on phasing down hydrofluorocarbons, as outlined in "Phasedown of Hydrofluorocarbons: Management of Certain Hydrofluorocarbons and Substitutes Under the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020".

Roger Marshall
R

Roger Marshall

Senator

KS

LEGISLATION

Joint Resolution Nixes EPA's HFC Phasedown Rule: Puts Climate Action on Ice

This joint resolution throws out the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) rule on phasing down hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), titled "Phasedown of Hydrofluorocarbons: Management of Certain Hydrofluorocarbons and Substitutes Under the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020" (89 Fed. Reg. 82682). Basically, it kills a rule designed to reduce the use of these potent greenhouse gases.

Scrapping the HFC Phasedown

The EPA's now-defunct rule was all about managing and reducing HFCs—powerful greenhouse gases often used in refrigeration and air conditioning—as part of the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020. By scrapping this, the resolution essentially says, "never mind" to those planned reductions.

Real-World Rollback

Without the EPA's rule, businesses that use or make HFCs won't have to switch to more climate-friendly alternatives as quickly. Think about:

  • HVAC companies: They could keep using existing refrigerants longer without needing to upgrade systems.
  • Supermarkets: Might delay replacing older refrigeration units that rely on HFCs.
  • Car manufacturers: Could stick with current air conditioning systems in vehicles, avoiding the costs of transitioning to newer, greener tech.

While this might keep costs down in the short term, it could mean bigger problems down the line. We're talking about potentially higher greenhouse gas emissions and a slower shift to more sustainable technologies. For the average person, this could translate to a longer timeline for dealing with the impacts of climate change, like more extreme weather and higher energy costs in the long run.

The Bigger Picture

This move essentially hits the pause button on efforts to cut down on HFCs, which are known to be way more potent than carbon dioxide when it comes to global warming. It also raises questions about how serious we are about meeting climate goals and international agreements on reducing greenhouse gases. It's like deciding to keep driving a gas-guzzler instead of switching to an electric vehicle because it's cheaper upfront, ignoring the long-term costs to your wallet and the environment.