Recognizes the historical and ongoing value of tax-exempt fraternal benefit societies in providing critical benefits and community support throughout the United States. Encourages the continued promotion of their work.
Michael "Mike" Crapo
Senator
ID
This concurrent resolution recognizes the significant historical and ongoing contributions of tax-exempt fraternal benefit societies to communities across the United States. It acknowledges their extensive volunteer network and substantial charitable giving, which helps to meet various needs and support financial security. The resolution affirms that their tax-exempt status continues to benefit the country and that their work should be encouraged.
This concurrent resolution is essentially Congress giving a big thumbs-up to fraternal benefit societies – think groups like the Elks, Moose Lodge, or Knights of Columbus – and their tax-exempt status. It's a formal nod to their history of providing mutual aid and financial security to members, along with their ongoing charitable work across the country.
The resolution acknowledges that these societies have been around for a long time (tax-exempt since 1909!) and have played a significant role in supporting communities. It highlights their nationwide reach, boasting a volunteer network of roughly 7,000,000 people. Congress is recognizing the value of the work these groups do, citing an estimated $3,800,000,000 annually in charitable giving, educational programs, and volunteer activities. The resolution directly states these societies provide "critical benefits to the people and communities of the United States."
This isn't about new laws, but rather a strong reaffirmation of the existing tax-exempt status of these organizations. Think of it as Congress saying, "We see you, we appreciate what you do, and we support keeping things as they are." For members of these societies, it means the benefits they receive (life, health, accident, etc.) will likely remain unchanged. For communities, it's a signal that the charitable activities and volunteer work supported by these groups are valued at the federal level. The resolution points out that these societies help "meet unmet needs," reducing the burden on government programs.
While the resolution paints a rosy picture, it's worth noting a couple of things. The continued tax exemption means these organizations operate with a financial advantage. While they're doing charitable work, there's always the potential for that system to be, let's say, less than perfectly managed. Although the text talks about "critical benefits," it doesn't lay out specific oversight mechanisms for how that $3.8 billion in charitable contributions is being used. It's a point to keep an eye on, even if this resolution itself doesn't change anything on that front.