PolicyBrief
S.CON.RES. 20
119th CongressAug 1st 2025
A concurrent resolution recognizing the 50th anniversary of the Helsinki Final Act and reaffirming the United States' commitment to its principles and values.
IN COMMITTEE

This concurrent resolution recognizes the 50th anniversary of the Helsinki Final Act and reaffirms the United States' enduring commitment to its foundational principles of security, cooperation, and human rights.

Roger Wicker
R

Roger Wicker

Senator

MS

LEGISLATION

Congress Reaffirms 50-Year-Old Human Rights Pact, Condemning Current Global Violations

This concurrent resolution marks the 50th anniversary of the Helsinki Final Act—an international agreement signed back in 1975. Essentially, Congress is taking a moment to officially confirm that the U.S. remains fully committed to the ten core principles of that Act, which link national security with economic cooperation and, most importantly, human rights. While this is a non-binding resolution (meaning it doesn't create new laws or spend money), it’s a major diplomatic signal that the foundational rules for international relations, established during the Cold War, are still the standard the U.S. expects everyone to follow.

The Security Blanket That Included Human Rights

What was the Helsinki Final Act? Think of it as one of the first major agreements that said you can’t separate a country’s security from how it treats its own citizens. The Act laid out ten principles, including respecting borders, settling disputes peacefully, and protecting fundamental human rights like freedom of thought and religion. For the average person, this framework has mattered for decades because it helped establish the expectation that governments can’t just do whatever they want behind closed doors; how they treat their people is part of international stability.

Calling Out the Rule Breakers

The resolution doesn't just celebrate history; it gets specific about current threats. It explicitly calls out nations—mentioning Russia's occupation of parts of Ukraine, Moldova, and Georgia—for blatantly violating these 1975 principles. This is Congress using its voice to say that actions like invading neighbors or ignoring basic human rights aren't just bad; they are a direct challenge to the rules-based order the U.S. helped establish. For those who follow international affairs, this statement reinforces the U.S. position against authoritarian aggression.

Why This Still Matters in the Real World

While resolutions don't directly change your paycheck, they define the diplomatic landscape. This resolution reinforces the work of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe (the Helsinki Commission), a group of U.S. lawmakers and executive branch officials tasked with monitoring whether countries are actually sticking to these rules. For small businesses that rely on stable international trade or for families with relatives overseas, this commitment to stability and human rights provides a crucial, if abstract, diplomatic foundation. The resolution also encourages public officials, teachers, and citizens to observe the 50th anniversary, aiming to keep these foundational principles relevant for the next generation.

In short: Congress is giving a 50th-anniversary toast to a key diplomatic agreement, confirming the U.S. is still playing by the old rules—and reminding everyone else that they should be, too.