This concurrent resolution formally recognizes the health and safety emergency facing children due to the previous administration's fossil fuel promotion and suppression of climate science, demanding alignment with children's rights and climate stability goals.
Jeff Merkley
Senator
OR
This concurrent resolution formally recognizes a health and safety emergency disproportionately affecting children due to the previous administration's directives promoting fossil fuels and suppressing climate science. Congress asserts these policies increased greenhouse gas emissions, endangering children's fundamental constitutional rights to life and security. The resolution demands the reversal of policies that hindered clean energy and calls for federal actions to align with limiting CO2 to below 350 ppm this century to protect future generations.
This concurrent resolution is Congress formally putting its foot down, declaring that the effects of climate change—driven by fossil fuel expansion and the suppression of climate science—constitute a health and safety emergency that disproportionately harms children. While a resolution doesn't create new law, it’s a powerful statement demanding the executive branch immediately stop implementing previous directives that boosted fossil fuel production and weakened environmental protections. Specifically, it calls for the government to align all long-term energy and climate actions with the goal of reducing atmospheric carbon dioxide to less than 350 parts per million (ppm) by 2100, effectively making a stable climate a benchmark for future policy.
One of the most significant arguments here is the claim that the U.S. Constitution protects children’s fundamental rights to life, liberty, and property, and that a stable climate is necessary for them to enjoy those rights. Think of it this way: if your kid can’t play outside because the air quality is terrible from wildfire smoke, or if your home insurance skyrockets due to constant flooding, the government’s failure to maintain a stable climate is seen as infringing on their basic security and property. The resolution argues that past actions promoting fossil fuels and increasing greenhouse gases are a violation of these rights. This isn't just policy talk; it’s a legal framework that could fuel future lawsuits seeking to hold the government accountable for climate inaction.
If you’re a parent, this part hits close to home. The resolution highlights that the previous administration’s policies are directly linked to public health crises, citing experts who project nearly 200,000 additional deaths over the next 25 years due to increased air pollution. Why the focus on kids? Because their brains and lungs are still developing until they’re about 25, making them far more vulnerable to pollutants. We’re talking higher rates of asthma hospitalizations from wildfire smoke, increased infant mortality during heat waves, and even mental health issues like anxiety and PTSD because they see the government ignoring the science meant to protect them. For the working parent, this translates to more sick days, higher medical bills, and real worry about the air quality in the neighborhood.
The resolution is clear that the burden of these policies isn't shared equally. It points out that Black, Brown, Indigenous, and low-income children suffer the most. These are the communities often located near fossil fuel infrastructure, facing higher pollution exposure from things like refineries or power plants. They also spend a larger percentage of their income on energy costs. By demanding the reversal of policies that allowed hazardous air pollutants to be released, the resolution aims to address this environmental injustice, linking cleaner air and a stable climate directly to equity. For example, a provision that reduces emissions from a nearby industrial plant means fewer asthma attacks for the kids living down the street, saving those families thousands in emergency room visits.
Beyond policy reversal, Congress is demanding a digital intervention: they want the executive branch to republish all climate science data and resources that were allegedly scrubbed or removed from federal websites. This action is critical for scientists, students, and businesses that rely on accurate government data to make informed decisions about everything from infrastructure planning to agricultural practices. Essentially, they want the government to stop censoring scientific facts and restore the public trust in federal climate research, ensuring that the next generation of engineers and planners has access to the best available information.