The "Freedom to Haul Act of 2025" prevents the EPA from enforcing emission rules that limit the availability of new motor vehicles and mandates revisions to existing regulations to avoid technology mandates and engine-type restrictions.
Dan Sullivan
Senator
AK
The "Freedom to Haul Act of 2025" prevents the EPA from enforcing the Phase 3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Heavy-Duty Vehicles. It also amends the Clean Air Act to ensure that vehicle emission regulations do not mandate specific technologies or limit the availability of new vehicles based on engine type. The EPA must revise existing regulations to comply with these changes within two years.
Alright, let's break down the "Freedom to Haul Act of 2025." This proposed legislation essentially does two main things: First, it slams the brakes on a specific set of stricter emission rules the EPA finalized for heavy-duty vehicles like big rigs – known as the Phase 3 standards (Section 2). Second, it rewrites a part of the Clean Air Act to limit how the EPA can regulate all vehicle tailpipes going forward (Section 3).
The most immediate impact? That Phase 3 rule for heavy-duty trucks, which aimed to significantly cut greenhouse gas emissions starting with model year 2027 vehicles, would be shelved. Section 2 explicitly prohibits the EPA Administrator from implementing or enforcing it. Think about the trucking companies managing large fleets – this could mean delaying potentially costly upgrades to newer, cleaner engine technologies required by those Phase 3 standards. It keeps the current generation of engine tech viable for longer, potentially easing short-term purchase costs for new trucks.
But this bill goes beyond just heavy-duty trucks. Section 3 amends the Clean Air Act itself, putting new guardrails on any EPA vehicle emission regulations finalized after January 1, 2021, or proposed after this bill passes. The key changes? The EPA wouldn't be allowed to issue rules that effectively mandate specific technologies (like certain types of catalytic converters or electric drivetrains) or limit the sale of new vehicles based purely on their engine type (like gas vs. electric). The idea seems to be preserving consumer and manufacturer choice when it comes to powertrains. For instance, the EPA couldn't set an emission standard so stringent that only electric vehicles could meet it, effectively banning the sale of new gas-powered cars.
What happens next if this passes? The EPA gets a two-year deadline (Section 3) to go back and revise any existing regulations issued since the start of 2021 to make sure they "align" with these new limitations. That word "align" leaves some room for interpretation, but the direction is clear: regulations shouldn't push specific technologies or restrict engine types. The practical effect could be a rollback of measures designed to accelerate the shift to lower-emission vehicles across the board, not just for heavy trucks. While it preserves choice in the showroom, it also likely means slower progress on reducing transportation emissions and potentially impacts air quality, especially for communities near major roadways.