PolicyBrief
S. 986
119th CongressMar 12th 2025
Safe Schools Improvement Act
IN COMMITTEE

The "Safe Schools Improvement Act" aims to prevent bullying and harassment in schools by requiring states to establish and report on anti-bullying policies that protect students based on various characteristics.

Timothy "Tim" Kaine
D

Timothy "Tim" Kaine

Senator

VA

LEGISLATION

Safe Schools Act Mandates Anti-Bullying Policies & Public Data Reporting for Federally Funded Schools

The Safe Schools Improvement Act proposes a significant update to how public schools handle bullying and harassment. If enacted, this bill amends the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, requiring states that receive specific federal funds (under Title IV) to ensure their local school districts implement comprehensive anti-bullying policies. The core goal is straightforward: create safer learning environments by actively preventing and addressing conduct that harms students or limits their ability to participate in school.

Drawing the Line: New Anti-Bullying Rules for Schools

So, what exactly do these policies need to include? The bill mandates that local schools establish rules prohibiting bullying and harassment that create fear, hinder a student's education, or foster a hostile environment. This isn't just about physical aggression; it covers verbal and nonverbal intimidation too. Crucially, Section 3 explicitly requires these policies to ban bullying based on a student's actual or perceived characteristics, listing race, color, national origin, sex (which includes sexual orientation, gender identity, and sex characteristics), disability, or religion. Protection also extends to bullying based on association with people having these characteristics, or any other traits defined by the state or local district. Think of it as setting a clear baseline standard across funded schools.

Keeping Tabs: The Mandate for Bullying Data

Beyond just having policies, the bill emphasizes transparency and tracking. Schools and local districts will be required to collect annual data on the incidence and frequency of bullying and harassment incidents. This information, stripped of identifying details about victims or perpetrators, must be made publicly available. Imagine being able to look up reported bullying stats for your local district. Furthermore, states will need to compile this data into biennial reports for the Secretary of Education, outlining their plans to support schools. The Secretary, in turn, is tasked with evaluating these programs and reporting findings to Congress starting January 1, 2026, essentially creating an accountability loop.

The Day-to-Day: What Changes for Students and Schools?

For students and parents, this means clearer rules and reporting paths. Schools must provide annual notice about prohibited conduct and the established grievance procedures – including who to contact and expected timelines for resolution. If your child experiences bullying covered by the policy, there should be a defined process to follow. For schools, this translates to potentially updating existing policies, training staff, and implementing robust data collection systems. While the bill's findings (Section 2) encourage evidence-based interventions like PBIS to minimize punitive measures, the requirement to define, track, and report incidents represents a significant administrative task. Defining what constitutes a 'hostile educational environment' based on the bill's language might also present implementation challenges, requiring careful guidance to ensure fairness and consistency.

The Legal Landscape: Rights and Boundaries

The bill takes care to state it doesn't override existing rights under other federal or state non-discrimination laws, nor does it mess with First Amendment free speech rights (Section 3). It essentially layers specific anti-bullying requirements onto the existing legal framework for schools receiving these federal funds. States and local districts can still enact their own anti-bullying laws, provided they align with this federal standard. It’s focused on setting a floor, not a ceiling, for protecting students within the scope of federally supported programs.