The Customs Facilitation Act of 2025 streamlines trade by unifying federal border processing technology, modernizing duty refunds and export reporting, and increasing transparency and accountability in CBP data collection and response times.
Bill Cassidy
Senator
LA
The Customs Facilitation Act of 2025 modernizes trade by establishing a unified, automated system for cargo processing across all federal agencies to speed up legitimate trade and enhance security. It streamlines CBP processes by accelerating duty refunds for exporters and reducing redundant reporting requirements for businesses. Furthermore, the bill mandates greater transparency and accountability by setting strict rules for collecting trade data and requiring faster response times for official rulings and petitions.
This new legislation, the Customs Facilitation Act of 2025, is essentially an overhaul of how the federal government manages international trade. It’s less about new tariffs and more about making the entire logistics chain—from the moment a container hits the port to when it’s delivered—run faster, cheaper, and with less paperwork. The bill’s core purpose is to modernize the customs process, eliminate data redundancy, and force better coordination among the dozens of federal agencies that touch imported and exported goods.
If you work in logistics, manufacturing, or e-commerce, you know the pain of submitting the same data—like a cargo manifest or product classification—to three different agencies just because they all need it for their own records. Section 102 aims to kill that headache by mandating a single, unified system for processing all import and export cargo. This new platform, likely an upgrade to the existing Automated Commercial Environment (ACE), must pull all “whole-of-Government” trade processing into one place. Crucially, the system must automatically share data between agencies. If U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) already has the data, the Department of Agriculture shouldn't have to ask for it again, unless they need it for a specific double-check.
This is a massive shift. For importers and exporters, it means faster release times and lower compliance costs. For the agencies, it means a huge internal data restructuring. To make sure the system actually works, the bill establishes the Border Interagency Executive Council (Section 101), essentially a high-level committee of senior officials from every agency involved in border trade—from Homeland Security to the EPA. Their job is to create common rules and definitions so that when a business submits a document, everyone is speaking the same language.
For businesses that import materials, pay a duty on them, and then export the finished product, getting those duties back (called "drawback") can be a slow, bureaucratic nightmare. Section 201 streamlines this process significantly. If a company meets certain compliance requirements—proving they have the records to handle it and securing a bond—CBP must pay the estimated refund immediately, before the final audit is complete. This means companies get their cash flow back faster, which is huge for manufacturers and supply chain managers. The bill also eliminates the requirement to notify CBP before exporting merchandise for certain claims, cutting down on administrative lead time.
Section 203 offers a dose of common sense for anyone who has ever mistyped a number into a government form. It clarifies that simple clerical errors or honest mistakes in export data submissions will not be treated as a violation unless they are part of a larger, ongoing pattern of non-compliance. Even better, if an electronic system repeats the same initial mistake over and over, that repetition alone won't count as a "pattern of violative conduct." This distinction protects businesses from being penalized for a single, initial typo that gets copied by automated systems.
One of the most practical changes for the trade community is Section 303, which sets deadlines for CBP to respond to requests. The Commissioner of CBP is required to review all existing response times for petitions, protests, and requests for advice—and speed them up where possible. This is about accountability; if a business is waiting on a crucial ruling from CBP, they need to know when they can expect an answer. To keep things honest, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) must issue a report within one year detailing how long CBP actually takes to issue rulings, including the average time taken for responses that currently have no deadline.
Additionally, Section 204 mandates that the GAO study CBP’s entire fee schedule and recommend ways to lower costs for businesses that are consistently compliant with trade laws. If you're a good actor, this bill aims to reward you with lower administrative burdens and potentially lower fees, recognizing that compliant businesses make the government's job easier.