The Parris Island Protection Act prohibits the use of federal funds to close or realign the Marine Corps Recruit Depot at Parris Island, South Carolina, ensuring its continued operation and legacy as the home of the Marine Corps' Eastern Recruiting Region.
Lindsey Graham
Senator
SC
The Parris Island Protection Act prevents federal funds from being used to close or realign the Marine Corps Recruit Depot at Parris Island, South Carolina, or to plan for its closure or realignment. The Act recognizes the Depot's historical and cultural significance to the Marine Corps and the nation. It affirms Parris Island as the home of the Marine Corps' Eastern Recruiting Region. The Act aims to ensure the Depot's continued service to the United States.
The 'Parris Island Protection Act' directly prevents any federal money from being used to shut down or move the Marine Corps Recruit Depot at Parris Island, South Carolina. This bill basically cements Parris Island’s role, highlighting its historical and cultural importance to the Marine Corps and the nation. (SEC. 2 & SEC. 3)
The bill lays out some serious respect for Parris Island, noting it's been a Marine Corps hub since 1891 and has played a key role in preparing Marines for every major conflict since World War I. It calls the depot "culturally and historically significant" and flat-out says it’s here to stay as the home of the Marine Corps’ Eastern Recruiting Region. (SEC. 2)
For folks in and around Parris Island, this means the depot—and all the jobs and economic activity it brings—isn't going anywhere. For the Marines, it means their East Coast training pipeline remains unchanged. Think of a local restaurant that has served generations, or a car repair shop. Their customer base is secure.
This law is straightforward: no federal funds can be used to close or even plan the closure or relocation of Parris Island. It ensures the depot will continue operating, maintaining its legacy and its role in training new recruits. (SEC. 3). While this provides stability, it is worth noting that prohibiting realignment might prevent more efficient use of military resources if Parris Island becomes less strategically important in the future. It also sets a precedent, meaning other bases could get similar protection, even if closing them down the line would make sense.