PolicyBrief
S. 93
119th CongressFeb 5th 2025
Harmful Algal Bloom and Hypoxia Research and Control Amendments Act of 2025
AWAITING SENATE

This bill amends the Harmful Algal Bloom and Hypoxia Research and Control Act of 1998, updating the task force, and directing the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to expand research, monitoring, and response activities related to harmful algal blooms and hypoxia, and authorizing appropriations for fiscal years 2026 through 2030. It also modifies the National Integrated Drought Information System Reauthorization Act of 2018, regarding harmful algal blooms and hypoxia.

Dan Sullivan
R

Dan Sullivan

Senator

AK

LEGISLATION

Freshwater Frenzy: New Bill Tackles Algae Blooms and Hypoxia with $29.5M Annual Funding

The Harmful Algal Bloom and Hypoxia Research and Control Amendments Act of 2025 is shaking things up in the world of water quality. This isn't just some minor tweak; it's a significant overhaul of how the U.S. tackles those nasty algae blooms and oxygen-depleted zones (hypoxia) that can wreak havoc on our lakes, rivers, and coasts.

Watering Down the Problem

The core of the bill is about beefing up the existing Harmful Algal Bloom and Hypoxia Research and Control Act of 1998. It expands the Inter-Agency Task Force, bringing in the Department of Energy, and it's now mandatory to have a comprehensive action strategy that is updated every five years. This strategy will include detailed scientific assessments of the blooms and their effects. The Task Force is specifically directed to consult with, well, just about everyone – states, tribes, local governments, industries, universities, and NGOs (SEC. 2). It's a "whole community" approach to figuring out what's going on and how to deal with it.

Show Me the Money (and the Science)

This bill isn't just about plans; it's about action. It sets aside a hefty chunk of change – $19.5 million annually to the Under Secretary (presumably of Commerce for NOAA) and another $8 million annually to the EPA Administrator, all the way through 2030 (SEC. 2). That money is earmarked for things like:

  • Better Monitoring and Forecasting: Think of it like a weather report, but for algae blooms. The goal is to create a national network that integrates federal, state, and local monitoring capabilities. This means more data, faster, to help predict and manage these events.
  • Research, Research, Research: The EPA gets tasked with digging deep into the impacts of freshwater blooms, while NOAA focuses on the coastal side. Both agencies will be developing monitoring and forecasting programs. For example, if you're a small business owner dependent on a lake for tourism, this research could help you prepare for potential bloom events that could hurt your bottom line.
  • Rapid Response: NOAA is directed to step up its game when it comes to responding to actual bloom events, with better forecasting, communication, and resource leveraging.
  • National-Level Incubator Program: Funding will be provided on a merit-based system to increase the availability of strategies and technologies to prevent, mitigate, and control harmful algal blooms. (SEC. 2)

Real-World Ripples

This bill has the potential to impact a wide range of people. If you live near a body of water, fish, or just care about clean water, this affects you. For instance:

  • Coastal Communities: Better monitoring and forecasting could give communities more time to prepare for blooms, potentially minimizing economic damage to tourism and fishing industries.
  • Tribal and Island Communities: The bill specifically requires consultation with these groups, recognizing their unique dependence on coastal and water resources. It also includes provisions for waiving the non-Federal share of costs for certain projects, acknowledging that some communities may lack the resources to contribute (SEC. 3).
  • Public Health: Harmful algal blooms can produce toxins that are dangerous to humans and animals. This bill aims to improve our ability to detect and respond to these threats, protecting public health.

The Catch?

The biggest challenge is always implementation. While the bill lays out a comprehensive framework, the devil is in the details. How effectively will these different agencies coordinate? Will the funding be sufficient to achieve the ambitious goals? And how will the "event of national significance" designation (SEC. 3) be used, and could it be stretched too thin? These are questions that will need close attention as this bill moves forward.