PolicyBrief
S. 923
119th CongressMar 10th 2025
Harriet Tubman Tribute Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

This act mandates that Harriet Tubman's likeness must appear on the face of all new $20 Federal Reserve notes printed after December 31, 2030, with a possible two-year delay under specific economic or security conditions.

Jeanne Shaheen
D

Jeanne Shaheen

Senator

NH

LEGISLATION

Harriet Tubman $20 Bill Mandate Set for 2030: Treasury Gets Two-Year Delay Option for Economic Safety

The Harriet Tubman Tribute Act of 2025 is short, sweet, and gets straight to the point: it mandates a major change to the $20 bill. Specifically, Section 2 requires the Secretary of the Treasury to ensure that every $20 Federal reserve note printed after December 31, 2030, features the likeness of Harriet Tubman on the front. This sets a firm, decade-end deadline for moving the redesign from concept to cash in hand.

The New Face of the Twenty

For anyone who uses cash—whether you’re a small business owner making change or a contractor getting paid—this bill confirms that the twenty-dollar bill is getting a new look. The purpose is straightforward: to recognize a critical figure in American history on one of our most common denominations. The real-world impact here is mostly symbolic, but symbols matter. It means that by 2031, the currency you pull out of the ATM will reflect a different piece of the nation’s story.

The Bureaucratic Safety Net

While the deadline is firm, the bill includes a practical escape hatch for the federal agencies responsible for printing money. The Secretary of the Treasury can push the December 31, 2030, date back by up to two years, but only under very specific circumstances. This is the government acknowledging that redesigning money isn't like updating a website—it involves complex logistics and security features.

The delay is only allowed if the Treasury determines, after consulting with the Bureau of Engraving and Printing (the folks who print the money), the Federal Reserve Board (the folks who distribute it), and the Secret Service (the folks who fight counterfeiting), that meeting the 2030 deadline would create “too much risk of counterfeiting or would seriously mess up how quickly and safely the U.S. economy runs.” If the Secretary decides to hit the pause button, they have to report the reasons directly to the Senate Banking Committee and the House Financial Services Committee.

Why the Fine Print Matters

That two-year delay clause is the most important operational part of the bill. For the people who actually have to execute this—the staff at the Bureau of Engraving and Printing—this provision gives them the necessary breathing room to manage the massive undertaking of a currency redesign without compromising security. Think about it: a botched currency rollout could wreak havoc on everything from vending machines to bank processing systems, not to mention the potential for new high-tech counterfeits. While the criteria for a delay—like “seriously mess up how quickly and safely the U.S. economy runs”—are a bit broad, they are tied to concrete operational concerns (counterfeiting risk and economic stability), which is a good safeguard. It ensures the symbolic goal doesn't override the practical need for secure, reliable cash flow.