The "Securing American Agriculture Act" mandates an annual report assessing U.S. dependency on critical agricultural products from China, identifying supply chain vulnerabilities, and recommending ways to reduce reliance.
Pete Ricketts
Senator
NE
The "Securing American Agriculture Act" directs the Secretary of Agriculture to annually assess and report on the United States' dependency on critical agricultural products and inputs from China. The report will identify supply chain vulnerabilities and recommend ways to reduce reliance on China, including boosting domestic production. This aims to safeguard American agriculture by addressing potential threats and vulnerabilities in the supply chain.
This bill, the "Securing American Agriculture Act," directs the Secretary of Agriculture to conduct a yearly assessment of how much the U.S. relies on China for essential agricultural goods and materials. Think things like fertilizer, animal feed components, farm equipment, and even seeds. The goal is to pinpoint potential weak spots in our food supply chain that could be exploited.
Each year, under this proposed law, the Secretary of Agriculture would need to deliver a report to Congress. This report isn't just a list; it's meant to be a deep dive. It must detail our current ability to produce these critical items domestically, identify supply chain bottlenecks China might leverage, and, crucially, recommend specific actions. These recommendations, developed with input from the U.S. Trade Representative, Commerce Secretary, and FDA Commissioner, would focus on reducing dependency on China. This could involve strategies to strengthen our own production or encourage sourcing from closer, allied nations ('nearshoring'). The bill specifically lists items like fuel, veterinary drugs, and crop protection chemicals as critical, but also gives the Secretary power to add other inputs to the list as needed (Sec. 2).
The practical upshot? These annual reports could pave the way for new government policies or regulations aimed at shifting where we get our farm supplies. The idea is to make the U.S. food system less vulnerable to disruptions originating from China. For farmers, this might eventually mean more options for domestically produced fertilizers or equipment, but it could also impact the cost and availability of inputs currently sourced cheaply from China. While the bill includes clauses (Sec. 2) stating that information gathered from private companies for the report must be kept confidential and used only for aggregate data—protecting trade secrets—the process of identifying vulnerabilities and recommending shifts inherently involves sensitive economic information.
A key aspect is the authority granted to the Secretary of Agriculture to define what constitutes a "critical agricultural input" beyond the initial list (Sec. 2). This flexibility allows the assessment to adapt to changing circumstances and emerging technologies or threats. However, it also means the focus of these reports—and subsequent policy recommendations—could shift depending on the Secretary's interpretation. While the aim is national security and supply chain resilience, the specific choices made in defining 'critical' will determine which sectors see the most impact, potentially affecting costs for both producers relying on these inputs and consumers at the checkout line.