This Act makes technical corrections and clarifications to the Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022 regarding lawsuit venue, proof standards, benefit offsets, and attorney fee limits.
Thom Tillis
Senator
NC
The Ensuring Justice for Camp Lejeune Victims Act of 2025 makes technical corrections and clarifications to the 2022 Camp Lejeune Justice Act. This bill adjusts rules for where lawsuits can be tried, clarifies the evidence needed to prove harm from water exposure, and sets limits on attorney fees. All changes are applied retroactively as if enacted on August 10, 2022, while preserving existing deadlines for filing claims.
The Ensuring Justice for Camp Lejeune Victims Act of 2025 is essentially a major tune-up for the 2022 law that allowed veterans and their families who were exposed to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune to sue the federal government. This isn't a new fight; it's about fixing the rules of the existing fight to make them clearer and, in some ways, fairer—but watch out for the fine print on compensation.
If you’re a Camp Lejeune claimant, this bill changes the logistics of your case. Previously, all lawsuits had to be filed and tried in the Eastern District of North Carolina. Think of that court like a single, overwhelmed DMV line for the whole country. This bill keeps that court in charge of the initial paperwork and pretrial coordination, but it allows the actual trial to be transferred to any federal district court within the fourth judicial circuit (which covers North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia, and Maryland). This should spread the workload and potentially speed things up. On top of that, the bill explicitly grants the right to a jury trial against the U.S. government, which is a big deal in civil litigation (Sec. 2).
One of the biggest hurdles in these cases is proving that the contaminated water actually caused the illness. The new law clarifies the standard of proof, which should help claimants. You now only need to show that the connection between the contaminant and your harm is “as likely as not” to exist. The language also expands the scope of injury from “latent disease” to “latent or potential harm.” This means if you have a condition that hasn't fully manifested but is a known risk from the exposure, you might still have a claim. This is a crucial clarification for conditions that take decades to develop or are still being monitored (Sec. 2).
Here is the part that demands attention, especially if you are already receiving disability payments from the VA or Medicare/Medicaid. The bill creates two tiers for how your settlement money is treated regarding offsets:
This distinction creates a significant financial difference for claimants. If you’re already receiving substantial VA benefits, settling early is financially advantageous, as you get to keep both the benefit payments and the full settlement amount (Sec. 2).
The bill puts clear limits on what lawyers can charge for handling these claims, which is good news for claimants worried about excessive legal bills. The maximum fee is capped based on the timing of the resolution:
While these caps offer protection, the difference between the 20% and 25% cap, combined with the offset rule, creates a strange incentive structure. Lawyers might be incentivized to file the lawsuit quickly to secure the higher 25% fee cap, even if an early settlement might have been possible. This is a detail that claimants should discuss thoroughly with their legal counsel (Sec. 2).
Crucially, all of these changes—the venue rules, the proof standards, the offset rules, and the fee caps—apply retroactively, as if they were signed into law on August 10, 2022. If you have a case pending, these new rules apply to you immediately. However, the original deadlines for filing a claim remain untouched (Sec. 3, Sec. 4).