PolicyBrief
S. 904
119th CongressMar 6th 2025
Livestock Disaster Assistance Improvement Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

The Livestock Disaster Assistance Improvement Act of 2025 amends existing programs to improve and expand disaster assistance for livestock producers, honeybee producers, and farm-raised fish, and establishes a working group to improve drought monitoring.

John Thune
R

John Thune

Senator

SD

LEGISLATION

Livestock Disaster Aid Bill Expands Eligibility, Speeds Up Drought Relief, and Creates New Drought Data Group

Congress is looking at tweaking how disaster aid gets to farmers and ranchers, particularly when drought hits hard. The Livestock Disaster Assistance Improvement Act of 2025 aims to broaden who qualifies for help, speed up certain processes, and improve how drought is measured.

Easier Access to Help During Hard Times

First off, this bill opens the door wider for who can get help from the Emergency Conservation Program and the Emergency Forest Restoration Program (Sec. 2). Currently, you generally need to own the land. This bill proposes extending eligibility to folks who have federal permits for farming or grazing on federal land, and those leasing land from state or local governments. Think ranchers grazing cattle on Bureau of Land Management (BLM) land – they could now qualify for aid under these programs.

It also changes the Livestock Forage Disaster Program (Sec. 3). Right now, you need to show grazing losses for at least 8 straight weeks to get one month's payment. This bill cuts that down to just 4 consecutive weeks to get one month's payment. If you hit the 8-week mark, the payment doubles to two months' worth. This could mean quicker financial relief for producers facing shorter, intense drought periods.

Building Stronger, Smarter Support

The bill doesn't just focus on immediate relief; it allows payments for building new permanent improvements like water wells or pipelines under the Emergency Conservation Program (Sec. 2). It also allows funding to replace temporary fixes with permanent ones. This could help operations become more resilient to future droughts.

For livestock owners, the Emergency Assistance program is broadened (Sec. 4). Critically, it adds "drought" explicitly as a covered reason for losses, alongside things like feed/water shortages or disease. This clarifies eligibility for a major challenge many face. Honeybee producers also see changes, with payment rates set to include per-hive and per-colony loss rates (excluding colony collapse disorder losses) and standardized documentation requirements nationwide.

Getting the Data Right: Improving Drought Watch

Ever wonder how drought levels are officially decided? This bill tackles that by setting up a new interagency working group focused solely on improving the data behind the U.S. Drought Monitor (Sec. 5). Representatives from USDA, NOAA, the National Drought Mitigation Center, Interior, and state-level programs will collaborate. Their job is to find ways to incorporate more on-the-ground data, address data gaps, evaluate new monitoring tech (like remote sensing), and make the whole process more transparent. They have a year to report back with recommendations.

Following that report, the Farm Service Agency (which handles many aid programs) and the Forest Service (which manages grazing on federal lands) must create a plan to align how they assess drought severity and coordinate their responses (Sec. 6). The goal is more consistency for producers who might interact with both agencies.

Faster Help, Fewer Hurdles? The Trade-offs

One significant change aims to speed things up during drought emergencies. For certain conservation projects on BLM land funded through the Emergency Conservation Program, the bill proposes waiving the standard 30-day public comment period required under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (Sec. 2). It also allows the Secretary of the Interior to accept environmental reviews done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. While this could get projects like emergency water pipelines approved faster, it also means less time for public input and environmental scrutiny on federal lands during declared droughts. It's a potential trade-off between speed of assistance and environmental oversight.