This Act bans colleges receiving federal aid from giving preferential treatment in admissions to applicants based on alumni or donor connections.
Jeff Merkley
Senator
OR
The Fair College Admissions for Students Act prohibits colleges and universities that receive federal student aid from giving preferential treatment in admissions based on an applicant's relationship to alumni or donors. This legislation aims to eliminate legacy and donor preferences in the college application review process. The ban will take effect starting with the second award year following the law's enactment.
The newly proposed Fair College Admissions for Students Act is designed to level the playing field in higher education. Simply put, this bill bans colleges and universities that accept federal student aid—which is most of them—from giving any special preference to applicants based on their family's connection to the school. That means no bonus points in the admissions office if your parents or relatives are alumni (the classic "legacy" status) or if they have donated money to the institution.
This legislation cuts straight to the heart of what many see as an unfair system: access to elite education based on who your family knows or how much they've given, rather than academic merit or potential. For years, the legacy preference has been a quiet advantage, often tipping the scales for applicants who might otherwise be borderline. Under Section 2 of this Act, that ends. If a college relies on federal student aid programs (like Pell Grants or federal loans), they must treat all applicants equally, regardless of whether their family name is on the side of a building or in the alumni directory.
This change is a huge win for the average applicant—the high school senior who’s grinding through AP classes and working a part-time job, whose parents didn't attend the university and certainly haven't endowed a chair. It means that when they submit their application, they are competing strictly against the quality of their own application, not against a built-in advantage afforded to others. For example, a student from a rural public school who excels in science now has a better shot at a competitive engineering program because they won't be competing against a legacy applicant whose only edge was their parent's diploma.
This rule won't appear overnight. The bill specifies that the ban takes effect on the first day of the second federal student aid award year following the law’s enactment. Assuming the law passes relatively soon, we’re looking at a start date sometime in the 2025-2026 academic cycle, giving institutions a runway to adjust their admissions policies. The biggest impact will be felt by highly selective private universities that have historically relied on legacy admissions to maintain donor engagement and tradition. They will now face the challenge of maintaining fundraising without the implicit promise of admissions preference for donor families.
While this bill clarifies exactly what is banned (legacy and donor preference), the challenge will be in compliance. Colleges might shift their focus to other subjective criteria that indirectly correlate with wealth or connection, like valuing 'demonstrated interest' or 'institutional loyalty' highly. However, the explicit ban on using family alumni or donor status as a positive factor is a powerful step toward ensuring that college admissions are based on individual achievement, not inherited privilege.