The "No Budget, No Pay Act" withholds congressional pay if Congress fails to pass a budget resolution and all regular appropriations bills by October 1st of each fiscal year, starting in 2027.
Rick Scott
Senator
FL
The "No Budget, No Pay Act" mandates that Members of Congress will not be paid if Congress fails to pass a budget resolution and all regular appropriations bills by October 1st of each fiscal year, starting September 29, 2027. The chairs of the House and Senate Budget and Appropriations Committees will determine if Congress has met this requirement. Members of Congress will not receive back pay for any period during which Congress did not comply with these requirements. This act aims to incentivize timely budget approvals and appropriations.
The 'No Budget, No Pay Act' is pretty straightforward: If Congress doesn't pass a budget and all regular spending bills by October 1st each year, members of Congress don't get paid. This kicks in starting September 29, 2027. The whole idea is to force Congress to get its act together and avoid those last-minute budget crises and potential government shutdowns that have become all too common.
This law puts the heat on Congress to get the budget done on time. Section 3 lays it out: a complete budget resolution and all appropriations bills need to be approved by the start of each fiscal year (October 1st). If they miss the deadline, Section 4 steps in and cuts off their paychecks. No loopholes, no back pay. The people in charge of making this call? The chairs of the Budget and Appropriations Committees in both the House and Senate (defined in Section 2). They're the ones who decide, as outlined in Section 5, whether Congress met the deadline and, if not, how long the pay freeze lasts.
Imagine a small business owner who relies on government contracts. If the government shuts down because Congress can't agree on a budget, that business owner could face serious financial strain. Or think about a federal employee, like a park ranger or a food inspector, suddenly furloughed without pay. This bill aims to prevent those situations by making sure Congress feels the pinch directly if they don't do their job on time. It's a bit of a 'tough love' approach, banking on the idea that hitting lawmakers in their wallets will make them more responsible with the nation's finances.
Now, here's where it gets tricky. The bill gives a lot of power to the Budget and Appropriations Committee chairs. They're the referees deciding if Congress followed the rules. This could lead to partisan games, where the chairs might use their power to push their party's agenda. There is also the risk that Congress could rush through poorly-vetted budgets, just to avoid a pay cut, which is not a great outcome. It's also worth noting that the bill doesn't really address why Congress struggles to pass budgets on time in the first place – the deep political divisions that often lead to gridlock. So, while the 'No Budget, No Pay Act' sounds good in theory, the real test will be how it plays out in the messy world of Washington politics, and whether or not Congress will just find new ways to kick the can down the road without actually solving the core problem.