This bill repeals the law that allows for automatic pay increases for members of Congress, effective with the 120th Congress.
Rick Scott
Senator
FL
This bill repeals the section of law that allows for automatic pay increases for members of Congress. By removing section 601(a)(2) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946, the bill ensures that congressional pay adjustments will no longer occur automatically. These changes will go into effect when the 120th Congress convenes.
Alright, here's the deal: Congress just dropped a bill that actually stops their automatic pay raises. Yep, you read that right. This bill, straight up, repeals Section 601(a)(2) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 – the part that gave members of Congress those yearly salary bumps without having to vote on it.
So, what does this mean in the real world? Starting with the 120th Congress, those automatic pay increases are history. No more yearly bumps just because. The bill also cleans up the language in Section 601(a) to reflect that this change is actually happening.
Think about it like this: imagine your boss getting an automatic raise every year, regardless of performance or company profits. That's essentially what was happening with Congress. This bill changes that. Now, any pay adjustments will have to be specifically addressed, meaning more debate and, potentially, more accountability. For instance, a small business owner struggling with rising costs might appreciate knowing that their representative isn't getting an automatic bump while they're tightening their own belt. Or a teacher who hasn't seen a decent raise in years might feel a bit better knowing Congress has to justify their own pay increases.
This isn't about whether Congress deserves a raise or not. It's about the process. By eliminating automatic adjustments, this bill forces more transparency and potentially more thoughtful consideration of congressional salaries. It could lead to a situation where pay is more directly tied to performance or economic realities. While it doesn't guarantee lower spending, it removes a built-in mechanism that could be seen as out of touch with the struggles of everyday Americans, from construction workers to coders.