Amends the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 to require lobbyists to disclose the name and address of any foreign government or political party that directs, plans, supervises, or controls their lobbying activities.
Charles "Chuck" Grassley
Senator
IA
This bill amends the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, requiring lobbyists to disclose any foreign government or political party that directs, plans, supervises, or controls their lobbying activities. This disclosure is required even if the foreign entity is not the lobbyist's direct client. The bill is named the "Disclosing Foreign Influence in Lobbying Act."
The "Disclosing Foreign Influence in Lobbying Act" aims to pull back the curtain on foreign influence in Washington. This bill amends the existing Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, forcing lobbyists to reveal not just who pays them, but who controls their actions, especially when it comes to foreign governments or political parties.
The core change is straightforward: if a foreign government or political party is calling the shots—directing, planning, supervising, or controlling a lobbyist's activities—that information must be disclosed. This applies even if the foreign entity isn't the lobbyist's direct client. Previously, the focus was solely on who was footing the bill, allowing some foreign influencers to operate in the shadows. This bill, specifically amending Section 2 of the Lobbying Disclosure Act, aims to close that loophole.
Imagine a scenario: A US-based lobbying firm is hired by a domestic corporation. However, a foreign government is secretly directing the lobbying firm's strategy to push for legislation that benefits that foreign power, even if it potentially harms US interests. Under this new bill, that foreign government's influence would have to be disclosed. This could impact everyone from trade associations pushing for specific international agreements to think tanks promoting foreign policy agendas favorable to certain countries.
While the goal is clear—increased transparency—the practical impact hinges on how "directs, plans, supervises, or controls" is interpreted. A savvy foreign entity might try to influence lobbying efforts indirectly, perhaps through layers of intermediaries, to avoid triggering disclosure. This could lead to a cat-and-mouse game between regulators and those seeking to skirt the rules. Additionally, while this bill shines a light on foreign influence, it doesn't address the broader issue of domestic entities with deep pockets wielding significant influence through lobbying, creating an uneven playing field that this bill doesn't tackle.
This bill is a direct response to growing concerns about foreign interference in US policymaking. It builds upon the existing framework of the Lobbying Disclosure Act, aiming to make it harder for foreign powers to secretly pull strings in Washington. However, its ultimate effectiveness will depend on rigorous enforcement and a willingness to adapt to potentially evolving tactics used to obscure foreign influence.