The STEP Act aims to enhance payment accuracy within federal programs by mandating thorough monitoring, reporting, and preventative measures against improper payments, without allocating additional funding for implementation.
James Lankford
Senator
OK
The "Safeguarding the Transparency and Efficiency of Payments Act" or "STEP Act," aims to enhance transparency and reduce improper payments within federal programs. It mandates executive agencies to identify and report on programs susceptible to significant improper payments, implement corrective action plans, and report annually to Congress on their progress in curbing fraud. The Act stipulates that no additional funds will be allocated for its implementation.
The Safeguarding the Transparency and Efficiency of Payments Act, or STEP Act, is all about tightening the belt on federal spending—specifically, cracking down on "improper payments." These are payments that shouldn't have been made, were made in the wrong amount, or went to the wrong person. Think of it like accidentally paying the wrong utility bill, but on a massive, government-wide scale.
The STEP Act puts new rules in place for executive agencies. Now, any program expected to spend over $100,000,000 in its first three years has to be checked for being at high risk of these improper payments. (SEC. 2). Agencies have to figure out how much money is likely going out the door by mistake, using statistically sound methods (or another method approved by the Office of Management and Budget). They then have to report these numbers every year, along with their financial statements. (SEC. 2).
For example, imagine a new federal grant program for small businesses. If it's projected to dish out $150 million in its first year, the agency running it will need to identify potential risks for improper payments and estimate how much money might be misspent. They'll have to keep close tabs on this, reporting annually on their progress in fixing any problems.
Agencies also have to send a report to Congress each year for the next ten years. (SEC. 2). These reports have to detail how they're implementing better financial controls and strategies to fight fraud. They'll have to show they're using best practices for managing fraud risks in their programs. It's like having to show your work on a math test – agencies need to prove they're taking steps to prevent mistakes and catch any that slip through.
Here's the kicker: the STEP Act specifically says no extra money will be provided to make all this happen (SEC. 3). Agencies will have to use their existing resources to meet these new requirements. This could be a challenge, especially for agencies already stretched thin. While the goal is to save money by reducing improper payments, the lack of additional funding could make it harder to implement the changes effectively. It's a bit like being told to build a fence but not being given any new wood – you'll have to get creative with what you've already got.
Ultimately, the STEP Act is about making sure taxpayer money is spent correctly. By increasing transparency and accountability, the hope is to reduce waste and improve the efficiency of government programs. However, the success of the Act will likely depend on how well agencies can adapt to these new requirements without additional financial support. If agencies can't implement the changes effectively, the bill has the potential to be toothless.