PolicyBrief
S. 788
119th CongressFeb 27th 2025
HOPE (Humans over Private Equity) for Homeownership Act
IN COMMITTEE

The "HOPE for Homeownership Act" aims to discourage large financial entities from acquiring single-family homes by imposing excise taxes and disallowing certain deductions on excess properties.

Jeff Merkley
D

Jeff Merkley

Senator

OR

LEGISLATION

HOPE Act Introduces New Taxes, Removes Deductions for Large Investors Holding Single-Family Homes

The HOPE for Homeownership Act aims to reshape the single-family housing market by introducing new financial hurdles for large-scale investors. It establishes an excise tax system targeting certain financial entities, like hedge funds, that acquire and hold numerous single-family residences. The core idea is to discourage these large players from accumulating vast portfolios of houses, potentially making more homes available for individual buyers.

Cracking Down on Bulk Buying: The New Taxes

The bill adds a new chapter (50B) to the tax code with two main tax components targeting specific investors. First, under Section 5000E, a "hedge fund taxpayer" (defined as an entity managing pooled investor funds with at least $50 million in net value or assets) faces an immediate tax upon buying a single-family home. This tax is the greater of 15% of the purchase price or $10,000 for each "newly acquired" property after the law's enactment.

Second, Section 5000F introduces an annual tax on "applicable taxpayers" (a broader category including partnerships, corporations, or REITs acting as fiduciaries, with some exceptions) holding what the bill deems "excess" single-family homes. If these entities own more homes than a yet-to-be-determined "maximum permissible units" limit by year-end, they'll owe $5,000 for each excess property. Importantly, homes sold in "disqualified sales" (like to another corporation or someone who already owns a home) still count towards the owner's total for tax purposes.

Say Goodbye to Certain Write-Offs

Beyond the new taxes, Section 3 of the Act targets existing tax benefits. If an entity is liable for the new excise tax under Chapter 50B for a given year, they will lose the ability to deduct mortgage interest and depreciation expenses for the single-family residences they own. This effectively increases the carrying cost for large investors holding these properties, further discouraging bulk ownership.

Defining the Lines: Who and What is Covered?

The details matter here. A "single-family residence" generally means a property with 1-4 dwelling units. However, there are key exclusions (Section 5000G): properties acquired through foreclosure (unless owned by a hedge fund taxpayer), owner-occupied principal residences (if the owner has an interest in the entity), and certain low-income housing tax credit properties (again, unless owned by a hedge fund taxpayer). The definition of "applicable taxpayer" excludes non-profits and entities primarily focused on building or rehabbing homes for sale. The bill also includes aggregation rules, meaning related business entities might be treated as a single owner, preventing easy workarounds by splitting portfolios.

Potential Real-World Impact

The clear intent is to make it less financially attractive for large investment firms to buy up single-family homes, potentially easing competition for individual homebuyers. By imposing upfront taxes and removing ongoing deductions, the bill increases costs for these investors. However, the effectiveness hinges on details like the final "maximum permissible units" threshold and how entities might adapt. The complexity of the definitions and rules could lead to compliance challenges or creative strategies to minimize tax liability. For instance, the specific criteria for "disqualified sales" and the various exclusions in the definition of a single-family residence might create avenues for avoidance if not carefully implemented and enforced.