PolicyBrief
S. 771
119th CongressFeb 27th 2025
End FEMA Benefits for Illegal Immigrants Act
IN COMMITTEE

This bill prohibits FEMA from using federal funds to support the sheltering of illegal immigrants.

James Risch
R

James Risch

Senator

ID

LEGISLATION

FEMA Funding for Migrant Shelters Cut: 'End FEMA Benefits for Illegal Immigrants Act' Pulls Support

The "End FEMA Benefits for Illegal Immigrants Act" directly targets how the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) spends its money. Specifically, this bill stops FEMA from funding any non-federal groups that help relieve overcrowding at Customs and Border Protection (CBP) facilities. Think shelters, basic supplies, even improvements to the buildings themselves – all off-limits for FEMA funding under this new rule (SEC. 2).

Cash Flow Shutdown

Beyond cutting off future funds, the bill claws back any money already sent to FEMA from CBP for these purposes but not yet spent. This specifically references funds from the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023 and the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2024 (SEC. 2). Basically, if FEMA was planning to use that cash to support migrant sheltering or related activities, those plans are canceled.

Real-World Ripple Effects

Imagine a local non-profit running a temporary shelter near the border. They've been using FEMA grants to provide beds, food, and basic hygiene to families waiting in overcrowded CBP facilities. Under this bill, that funding disappears. This could mean fewer beds, less food, and potentially worsening conditions for migrants already in a tough spot. For a single mom with kids, it might mean staying longer in a crowded CBP holding cell instead of a more humane shelter.

The Bigger Picture: Strained Resources

While the bill aims to tighten control over how FEMA spends its money, it raises questions about what happens next. If FEMA can't help alleviate overcrowding, the pressure on CBP facilities could increase. This could lead to tougher conditions and potentially longer wait times for people in custody. It also shifts the burden entirely onto non-federal entities, like charities and local governments, to handle a complex situation with potentially fewer resources. The law doesn't offer any alternative solutions to the issues it is trying to address, which means existing problems might just get shuffled around instead of solved.