PolicyBrief
S. 762
119th CongressFeb 27th 2025
No Immigration Benefits for Hamas Terrorists Act
IN COMMITTEE

Denies U.S. immigration benefits to individuals involved in the Hamas attacks against Israel beginning on October 7, 2023.

Marsha Blackburn
R

Marsha Blackburn

Senator

TN

LEGISLATION

New Bill Bars Anyone Linked to Oct. 7 Hamas Attacks from U.S. Entry or Asylum

The "No Immigration Benefits for Hamas Terrorists Act" directly targets anyone involved in the October 7, 2023 attacks against Israel. This bill flat-out denies entry to the U.S., and blocks any immigration relief—including asylum—for individuals who "carried out, participated in, planned, financed, supported, or otherwise facilitated" those attacks. (Section 2).

Asylum and Entry Shut Down

This bill changes the game by amending existing immigration laws. It makes anyone linked to the attacks inadmissible, meaning they can't legally enter the United States. It also cancels out any shot at relief under U.S. immigration laws. Think of it like this: someone fleeing persecution who might normally qualify for asylum? If they had any involvement, even supporting, the attacks, that option is off the table. The bill doesn't just target those who carried out the attacks, but also people who planned, financed, or otherwise supported or facilitated them. (Section 2(a)).

Real-World Example

Imagine a Palestinian doctor in Gaza who provided medical care to individuals, some of whom may have been members of Hamas or involved in the attacks. Under a broad interpretation of "facilitated," this doctor could potentially be denied entry or asylum in the U.S., even if their actions were primarily humanitarian. This is where the wording of the bill gets tricky. It uses broad terms like "supported" or "facilitated", and how those are defined in practice will make a big difference. (Section 2(a)).

Annual Headcount

The bill also orders the Secretary of Homeland Security to send an annual report to Congress. This report has to list the number of people blocked from entering or deported from the U.S. because of their connection to those October 7th attacks. (Section 2(b)). While this adds a layer of accountability, it also raises questions about how these individuals are identified and tracked.

Ties to Existing Laws

This new bill works by amending the existing Immigration and Nationality Act. This means it changes the fundamental rules about who can enter and stay in the country, and under what conditions. It essentially creates a new category of individuals who are automatically ineligible for any immigration benefits. (Section 2).

###Potential Roadblocks

This bill might hit legal roadblocks. International law has something to say about who qualifies for asylum, and this bill could conflict with those rules. There might be cases where the U.S. has an obligation to protect someone, even if they had some loose connection to the attacks. Plus, the broad wording about "support" and "facilitation" could lead to some tough, and potentially unfair, decisions down the line.