PolicyBrief
S. 650
119th CongressFeb 20th 2025
America's National Churchill Museum National Historic Landmark Act
IN COMMITTEE

This bill designates America's National Churchill Museum as a National Historic Landmark and requires a study to evaluate its potential inclusion in the National Park System.

Joshua "Josh" Hawley
R

Joshua "Josh" Hawley

Senator

MO

LEGISLATION

Churchill Museum in Missouri Gets National Historic Landmark Status: Study to Explore National Park Potential

The "America's National Churchill Museum National Historic Landmark Act" officially designates the museum in Fulton, Missouri, as a National Historic Landmark. This move doesn't change who runs the museum day-to-day—Westminster College, the City of Fulton, and the State of Missouri are still in charge—but it opens the door for some federal collaboration and potentially more resources down the line.

Landmark Status, Now What?

The bill, signed into law, officially recognizes the historical significance of America's National Churchill Museum, which includes the Winston Churchill Memorial. What this means in practice is that the Secretary of the Interior can now team up with local groups (public or private) through "cooperative agreements." Think of these as partnerships aimed at protecting the museum's historical resources and boosting its educational offerings. The feds can even chip in with technical and financial help (Section 3(b)(2)).

From Landmark to National Park?

Beyond the landmark designation, the bill kicks off a three-year study to see if the museum should become part of the National Park System (Section 4). This "special resource study" will look at the site's national importance, whether it's feasible to make it a national park, and what other options exist for preserving and interpreting the museum. The study will involve input from various groups, including federal agencies, state and local governments, and private organizations (Section 4(b)(5)). The Department of the Interior has to deliver a report on the study's findings and recommendations to Congress within three years of getting the funding.

Real-World Implications

For folks in Fulton, this could mean increased tourism, and a boost to the local economy. For history buffs, it means greater recognition and potentially better preservation of a significant site. For Westminster College, it could bring in more resources and collaboration opportunities. Importantly, the bill explicitly states that the landmark designation doesn't affect property owners' rights (Section 3(c)). So, if you own land near the museum, this bill won't change what you can do with your property.

Potential Challenges

While the bill sets up a framework for preservation and potential expansion, the real test will be in the implementation. The success of the cooperative agreements will depend on the details and the willingness of different parties to collaborate. And, of course, the three-year study is just the first step—whether the museum actually becomes part of the National Park System is a much bigger question that will depend on the study's findings, funding availability, and ultimately, a decision by Congress.