Automatically funds government programs at a reduced rate when Congress fails to pass a budget, preventing government shutdowns.
Rand Paul
Senator
KY
The "Government Shutdown Prevention Act of 2025" aims to prevent government shutdowns by automatically continuing funding for programs, projects, and activities if a new fiscal year begins without an approved budget. Funding will be capped at 94% of the previous year's rate, decreasing by 1% every 90 days, with exceptions for entitlements and mandatory payments. This ensures that the government remains operational while incentivizing Congress to pass regular appropriation bills.
The Government Shutdown Prevention Act of 2025 is designed to do exactly what it says: keep the government running even if Congress can't agree on a budget by the start of the fiscal year (October 1st). Instead of shutting down, most programs would keep getting money automatically—but there's a catch.
This bill automatically continues funding for any program that had money in the previous year. Think of it like hitting 'repeat' on last year's budget. But, and this is important, it does so at a reduced rate. Programs start at 94% of their previous funding, and that amount drops by 1% every 90 days the automatic funding is in effect (Section 2, amending 31 U.S.C. 1311). So, while the lights stay on, agencies will feel the pinch over time.
The bill also puts some limits on how agencies can spend this 'automatic' money. They can't blow it all at once, especially if they give out grants to states or other organizations (Section 2). This is to prevent agencies from front-loading spending and potentially leaving themselves short later on.
This bill is a mixed bag. It prevents the chaos of a shutdown—no closed offices, no interrupted services, no furloughed workers. But the automatic funding cuts create pressure, and potentially problems, over time. It's like a safety net with a slow leak. It'll hold, but things might get uncomfortable the longer it's used. And, while the bill aims to incentivize congress to pass a budget, it could also have the unintended consequence of prolonging budget impasses as one side or the other might prefer the automatic cuts.