This bill allows gun manufacturers and sellers to move certain lawsuits from state to federal court, where a judge will decide if the case qualifies as a "qualified civil liability action" and can be dismissed.
Mike Lee
Senator
UT
The PLCAA Federal Jurisdiction Act allows firearm manufacturers, sellers, or trade associations to move civil lawsuits from state to federal court if they believe the case qualifies as a "qualified civil liability action." The federal court then determines if the case meets this definition and has the power to dismiss it.
The "Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act Federal Jurisdiction Act" (PLCAA Federal Jurisdiction Act) gives gun manufacturers, sellers, and trade associations a new way to fight lawsuits. Instead of facing a civil case in state court, these groups can now request to move the case to a U.S. district court. The catch? They get to argue it's a "qualified civil liability action" – and if the federal judge agrees, the case gets dismissed.
This act changes where legal battles over gun-related harm can be fought. Previously, many of these cases would be handled in state courts. Now, the bill lets the gun industry essentially say, "We want this in federal court instead." Once there, a federal judge decides if the lawsuit fits the definition of a "qualified civil liability action." If it does, the case is thrown out, meaning the gun company or seller avoids potential liability.
Imagine a small gun shop owner who unknowingly sells a firearm to someone legally prohibited from owning one, and that gun is later used in a crime. Under this new law, if the victims' families sue, the shop owner could try to move the case to federal court and argue it falls under the "qualified civil liability action" definition, potentially getting the case dismissed. Or consider a gun manufacturer facing a lawsuit over alleged negligent marketing practices. They could use this law to try and shift the case to federal court, hoping for a dismissal. This impacts not just big companies, but potentially anyone involved in selling or making firearms.
This law raises some serious questions. For example, what if a state has strong gun safety laws and a history of holding the gun industry accountable? This bill could allow gun companies to bypass those state-level legal avenues. It also means that a federal judge, applying a potentially broader definition of "qualified civil liability action," gets the final say, not a state court that might be more familiar with local laws and community standards. Section 2 of the bill is where all the action is, laying out this new process for moving and potentially dismissing cases.
The challenge is going to be in the courtroom. What exactly qualifies as a "qualified civil liability action"? That definition will be key, and we can expect a lot of legal wrangling over it. This could mean lengthy court battles just to decide where a case should be heard, let alone the actual merits of the case. This adds another layer of complexity and cost for anyone trying to bring a lawsuit related to gun violence.