This act prohibits any person or government from interfering with or punishing individuals who travel across state lines to receive or provide reproductive health care that is legal in the destination state.
Catherine Cortez Masto
Senator
NV
The Freedom to Travel for Health Care Act of 2026 affirms the fundamental right of individuals to travel across state lines to receive reproductive health care that is legal in the destination state. This bill prohibits any government or person from restricting, sanctioning, or discriminating against individuals who travel for such care or those who assist them. It preempts conflicting state laws and establishes robust federal enforcement mechanisms, including civil actions for individuals and the Attorney General, while removing common immunity defenses for violators.
The Freedom to Travel for Health Care Act of 2026 establishes a federal right for individuals to cross state lines to access reproductive health services—including pregnancy prevention or termination—without fear of legal reprisal. Under Section 3, the bill prohibits any person or government from restricting, sanctioning, or discriminating against someone for traveling to a state where the care they seek is legal. This protection extends beyond the patient to include anyone who assists them, such as a friend driving them across the border or an organization providing travel funds. The bill also specifically bans retaliation, meaning a person cannot be denied a job benefit or a government privilege simply because they traveled for these medical services.
This legislation effectively creates a legal 'safe passage' for medical care. For a worker living in a state with restrictive health laws, Section 3(b) ensures that their home state cannot pass laws to fine or prosecute them for visiting a clinic in a neighboring state. It also prevents states from punishing doctors who treat out-of-state patients. For example, if a nurse in one state provides counseling to a patient from another, this bill prevents the patient's home state from trying to reach across the border to sue that nurse or pull their license. By preempting conflicting state laws, the bill ensures that federal travel rights take precedence over local restrictions.
To ensure these rights aren't just words on paper, the bill provides several ways to fight back in court. Under the 'Enforcement Mechanisms' in Section 3, the U.S. Attorney General can sue states or officials who try to block travel. Perhaps more importantly for the average person, individuals or organizations harmed by travel restrictions can file their own lawsuits in federal or state court. If you win, the court is required to award you money for damages and cover your attorney fees. This is a significant provision because it lowers the financial barrier for regular people to hold government officials accountable for overreach.
One of the most technical but impactful parts of this bill is its stance on 'sovereign immunity.' Usually, it is very difficult to sue state governments or officials because of legal shields like the Tenth or Eleventh Amendments. However, this bill explicitly states that officials cannot use 'qualified immunity' or 'sovereign immunity' as a defense if they are caught interfering with your right to travel for care. While the definition of 'reproductive health care' is broad enough that it might lead to some initial legal debates in court, the bill’s severability clause ensures that even if one specific part of the law is challenged, the rest of the travel protections remain in force for everyone else.