The All Students Count Act of 2026 mandates that states disaggregate student performance data for Asian American and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander subgroups to better address their distinct educational needs.
Mazie Hirono
Senator
HI
The All Students Count Act of 2026 mandates that states disaggregate student performance data for Asian American and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander subgroups. This change amends the Elementary and Secondary Education Act to reflect the diverse educational needs within these populations. The goal is to provide detailed, actionable data to better identify and support specific student groups often misrepresented as homogeneous.
The All Students Count Act of 2026 is a data-driven overhaul designed to stop treating millions of students as a monolith. Currently, the government lumps everyone from a dozen different countries into two broad buckets: 'Asian American' and 'Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander.' This bill changes the game by requiring states and school districts to break that data down into specific ethnic subgroups—like Hmong, Samoan, Filipino, and Marshallese—to see who is actually succeeding and who is falling through the cracks. These new reporting requirements are set to kick in 18 months after the bill becomes law.
Right now, if you’re a teacher or a local school board member, the data might tell you your 'Asian American' students are doing great overall. But that bird’s-eye view hides the reality that while some groups are thriving, others—like Cambodian or Laotian students—might be struggling with high dropout rates or low college enrollment. Section 2 of the bill points out that while only 12% of the general population lacks a high school diploma, that number jumps to 25% for Southeast Asian American adults. By forcing schools to report performance for 15 specific Asian subgroups and at least six Pacific Islander subgroups under Section 3, the bill ensures that a student’s specific background isn't erased by a broad label.
For a parent of a Hmong or Tongan student, this means their child’s unique educational needs are finally visible on a state level. If the data shows that 2nd-grade Marshallese students in a specific district are struggling with reading, the school can’t hide that behind a high-performing 'Pacific Islander' average; they’ll have to address it directly. The bill also pushes for even more granular data 'to the greatest extent practicable' for groups like the Iu Mien or Palauan communities. This level of detail is designed to help districts allocate resources, like bilingual tutors or targeted after-school programs, where they are actually needed rather than guessing based on outdated stereotypes.
This isn't just about making spreadsheets longer; it’s about the 'Statewide Accountability System.' By amending Section 1111 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, the bill ensures these specific subgroups are baked into how we measure a school’s success. The 18-month lead time gives school districts a window to update their software and enrollment forms. While the bill is clear on the primary groups, the 'practicable' clause for smaller subgroups leaves a little wiggle room for districts that might struggle with very small sample sizes, but the core mandate is a major step toward making the 'model minority' myth a thing of the past in the American classroom.