The "Protecting Sensitive Locations Act" limits immigration enforcement actions near sensitive locations like schools and places of worship, requiring oversight and reporting to protect communities.
Richard Blumenthal
Senator
CT
The "Protecting Sensitive Locations Act" amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to limit immigration enforcement actions within 1,000 feet of sensitive locations like schools and places of worship, requiring supervisor consultation and discreet conduct. Exceptions are allowed only in cases of national security or public safety threats or medical emergencies. The Act mandates annual training, detailed reporting of enforcement actions, and evidence suppression for violations, enhancing oversight and accountability in immigration enforcement.
The "Protecting Sensitive Locations Act" is a significant update to the Immigration and Nationality Act, essentially putting places like schools, hospitals, and churches largely off-limits for immigration enforcement. This means that, barring extreme circumstances, ICE and CBP agents won't be conducting raids or arrests within 1,000 feet of these locations. The law goes into effect 90 days from enactment.
This bill is all about where immigration enforcement can't happen. Section 2 of the bill lays out clear boundaries, restricting agents from operating near "sensitive locations." Think schools (from pre-K to higher ed), hospitals, places of worship, and even sites hosting funerals or weddings. The idea is to ensure people can access essential services and participate in community life without fear of immigration action.
For example, a parent who is undocumented won't have to fear being picked up by ICE while dropping off their child at school. Or, someone needing medical attention won't avoid going to the hospital because they're afraid of being detained. The bill specifically mentions that even if an enforcement action starts elsewhere but ends up near a protected location, agents have to stop and check in with a supervisor (Section 2(a)(1)(C)).
The bill makes exceptions for "exigent circumstances," like immediate threats to national security or public safety (Section 2(a)(6)(C)). But even then, agents are supposed to act discreetly and limit their time on-site (Section 2(a)(1)(B)). If agents mess up and violate these rules, any evidence they collect can be thrown out, and removal proceedings could be terminated (Section 2(a)(2)).
This isn't just a set of guidelines; it's a law with teeth. The bill mandates annual training for all relevant officials on these new rules (Section 2(a)(3)). Plus, there's a reporting requirement: every enforcement action near a sensitive location has to be reported to the Inspector General and the Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, detailing the who, what, where, and why (Section 2(a)(4)(A)). Both ICE and CBP also have to submit annual reports to Congress on these types of enforcement actions (Section 2(a)(4)(B)). The Office of the Inspector General will also be reporting to congress on complaints it receives. (Section 2(a)(4)(C)).
This bill aims to create a clearer, safer environment for immigrant communities. By limiting enforcement actions in places where people learn, receive healthcare, and practice their faith, it directly addresses concerns about access to essential services. The reporting requirements build in accountability, making sure the rules aren't just on paper but are followed in practice. The mandatory training helps ensure that all officers understand the new limitations and procedures. This bill is a direct response to real-world fears and aims to balance immigration enforcement with the need for safe community spaces.