The bill orders a study to evaluate Plum Island's potential for preservation as a National Park, Wildlife Refuge, or under other resource protection methods.
Richard Blumenthal
Senator
CT
The Plum Island Preservation Study Act mandates a study by the Secretary of the Interior to evaluate Plum Island's potential for designation as a National Park, National Wildlife Refuge, or other resource protection status. This includes assessing the island's national significance, consulting with stakeholders, and estimating associated costs. A report detailing the study's findings and recommendations must be submitted to Congress within three years of funding availability.
The "Plum Island Preservation Study Act" greenlights a deep dive into whether Plum Island, New York, should become a National Park, a National Wildlife Refuge, or get some other kind of federal protection. This isn't about rubber-stamping anything just yet—it's about figuring out the best way to handle the island's future, and that process is officially underway.
The Secretary of the Interior is now tasked with leading a comprehensive study of Plum Island. This includes everything from the buildings and land to the transportation and infrastructure. The study, mandated by SEC. 2, must determine the feasibility and implications of turning Plum Island into a nationally protected area. They're looking at whether it's significant enough to be a National Park, a Wildlife Refuge, or if another type of protection makes more sense.
Imagine a team of experts assessing the island, figuring out what it would take to open it up to the public, or keep it as a protected habitat. This isn’t just about environmental impact; it's also about practicalities. For example, if you're a local business owner, increased tourism from a National Park designation could be a game-changer. Or, if you're a nearby resident, you might be interested in how increased traffic or access might change the area.
This study isn't happening in a vacuum. The Secretary of the Interior has to consult with a range of folks—federal agencies, state and local governments, and relevant organizations (SEC. 2(b)(3)). This means everyone from environmental groups to local town councils will have a chance to weigh in. Within three years of getting the funds, the Secretary must report back to the Senate and House committees with findings, conclusions, and recommendations (SEC. 2(b)(5)).
One potential challenge is the cost. The study has to estimate the expenses of federal acquisition, development, operation, and maintenance for each option (SEC. 2(b)(4)). Depending on what they find, making Plum Island a National Park could be a very different financial commitment than, say, designating it a Wildlife Refuge. Another point to watch is how the "other resource protections" are defined—this could be a broad category, and the specifics will matter.
This study is a direct response to the question of what to do with Plum Island, and it ties into broader national conversations about conservation and land use. The outcome will determine not just the island's fate, but potentially set a precedent for how similar areas are handled in the future. The three-year timeline means that while the process is thorough, there's also a clear deadline for decisions to be made.