This bill would establish a commission to study the impact of slavery and discrimination against African Americans from 1619 to the present and to develop proposals for reparations. The commission will make recommendations on how to remedy the ongoing effects of slavery, including how to calculate and distribute compensation.
Cory Booker
Senator
NJ
The "Commission to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African Americans Act" establishes a commission to examine the legacy of slavery and discrimination against African Americans from 1565 to the present. The commission will identify the harms caused by these injustices and recommend appropriate remedies, including how the nation can best educate itself on the commission's findings. It will also explore methods of reparations, such as a formal apology, eliminating discriminatory laws, and providing compensation to descendants of enslaved individuals. The commission will then submit its findings and recommendations to Congress.
The "Commission to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African Americans Act" (SEC. 1) isn't just talking about the past; it's setting up a serious deep dive into how slavery still impacts Black communities today, and what, if anything, can be done about it. This bill creates a 13-member commission (SEC. 4) charged with producing concrete proposals for reparations, looking at everything from a formal government apology to potential financial compensation (SEC. 3).
The bill's findings (SEC. 2) lay out the brutal reality: 4 million Africans enslaved, government-backed oppression, and the lasting economic and social scars that persist. We're talking about disparities in wealth (Black families holding less than 1/6 the wealth of White families), higher incarceration rates, and ongoing discrimination in areas like housing and education. The commission will document the historical facts of slavery from 1565 to 1865 (SEC. 3) and connect the dots to present-day inequalities, like redlining and unequal school funding.
This is where it gets real. The commission isn't just studying history; it's tasked with recommending specific actions (SEC 3). Think of a small business owner in a historically redlined neighborhood – how might reparations address the decades of lost opportunity? Or consider a student struggling to afford college due to generations of economic disadvantage – what kind of support could make a difference? The commission will explore various forms of compensation, who would be eligible, and how it would be distributed. They'll also look at broader remedies, like eliminating discriminatory laws and policies, and ways to finally address the root causes of racial inequality. They are looking at international standards for what this could look like. The bill specifically mandates the commission to consider how to calculate compensation and what form it should take (SEC. 3).
This isn't an open-ended assignment. The commission has one year from its first meeting to deliver a written report to Congress with its findings and recommendations (SEC. 3). The President has 120 days after enactment (or 30 days after funding is secured) to call that first meeting (SEC. 4). The bill authorizes $12 million to fund the commission's work (SEC. 8), which includes hiring staff, conducting hearings, and gathering information from government agencies (SEC. 5 & 6). This means they can bring in experts, collect data, and really dig into the details. The commission is empowered to subpoena witnesses and documents if necessary (SEC. 5). The commission shuts down 90 days after submitting its report (SEC. 7).
While the bill sets a clear timeline and provides resources, the road ahead is complex. The commission's recommendations, particularly regarding financial compensation, are likely to spark intense debate. Determining eligibility, calculating the cost, and actually implementing any form of reparations will be a massive undertaking. The risk of mismanagement or misuse of funds (as noted in the analysis) needs careful consideration. The bill grants the commission significant power to appoint staff and spend funds, and while necessary for their work, this also requires strong oversight to prevent abuse.