PolicyBrief
S. 39
119th CongressJan 9th 2025
Securing Timely Opportunities for Payment and Maximizing Awards for Detaining Unlawful Regime Officials Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

The STOP MADURO Act authorizes a reward of up to $100 million, funded by seized regime assets, for information leading to the arrest and conviction of Nicolás Maduro.

Rick Scott
R

Rick Scott

Senator

FL

LEGISLATION

STOP MADURO Act Proposes $100 Million Bounty Funded by Seized Assets for Venezuelan Leader’s Arrest

The U.S. government is looking to put a massive price tag on the capture of Nicolás Maduro. The STOP MADURO Act aims to hike the reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of the Venezuelan leader to a staggering $100 million. This isn't just a symbolic gesture; it’s a direct response to 2020 charges involving narco-terrorism and cocaine importation. If you’ve ever wondered where those high-stakes international thriller plots come from, this bill brings that energy to real-world policy, specifically targeting what the U.S. calls a 20-year partnership between the Maduro regime and the FARC to flood American streets with drugs.

The $100 Million Bounty

Under Section 3, the Secretary of State would have the authority to pay out up to $100,000,000—a massive jump from standard reward limits—to anyone who provides the golden ticket of information. To put that in perspective, that’s enough to buy a fleet of private jets or fund a small city’s department for a year. The catch? The information must "directly lead" to both an arrest and a conviction. For a regular person, this means the stakes for whistleblowers or insiders just went through the roof, though the bill is clear that this isn't coming out of your tax dollars. Instead, the money is sourced exclusively from the liquidation of assets already frozen by the Treasury Department from Maduro and his associates.

Turning Seized Assets into Incentives

This is where the "street smarts" of the bill come in. Rather than asking Congress for a new budget line, Section 3(b) mandates that the reward money come from assets seized under authorities like the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act and various Executive Orders. It’s essentially using the regime’s own withheld wealth to fund its downfall. For the average American, this means the policy attempt to settle international scores is designed to be budget-neutral. However, the complexity of liquidating these frozen assets—which can include everything from bank accounts to luxury real estate—means the actual payout process could be a legal marathon.

High Stakes and Practical Hurdles

While the bill is specific about the dollar amounts and the legal charges (like the 30-year mandatory minimum for using machine guns mentioned in Section 2), the real-world execution is tricky. The term "directly leads to" is a high bar for any informant to meet, especially in a complex international conviction. Furthermore, while the bill targets Maduro and his inner circle, the ripple effects of liquidating such massive amounts of frozen assets could complicate diplomatic relations or future negotiations. It’s a bold move that treats international justice like a high-stakes manhunt, betting that $100 million is the right price to flip someone in Maduro’s orbit.