This Act significantly increases civil penalties for customs fraud, creates a private right of action for U.S. businesses injured by customs violations, and bars violators and their affiliates from participating in the importer of record program.
Katie Britt
Senator
AL
The Fighting Trade Cheats Act of 2026 significantly increases civil penalties for fraudulent and grossly negligent customs violations, including temporary import bans for violators and their affiliates. It also establishes a new private right of action, allowing U.S. businesses and unions to sue those who financially injure them through customs fraud. Furthermore, the bill bars individuals and affiliated persons found guilty of such violations from participating in the U.S. importer of record program.
The Fighting Trade Cheats Act of 2026 is designed to throw the book at companies that dodge U.S. customs laws. If a business is caught intentionally lying about what they’re bringing into the country or being 'grossly negligent' with their paperwork, the financial stakes are about to skyrocket. Specifically, the bill triples the monetary penalties for fraud to three times the domestic value of the goods and slaps violators with a mandatory five-year ban on importing anything else. Even if the mistake was just extreme carelessness rather than a flat-out lie, companies could face fines up to ten times the amount of unpaid taxes and duties, plus a two-year ban from the shipping docks. These changes aren't just a slap on the wrist; they are potential business-killers for those playing fast and loose with trade rules.
One of the most aggressive parts of this bill is how it defines who is responsible. It creates a 'presumption of knowledge' for repeat offenders. If you buy goods from two different companies that are 'affiliated'—meaning they share owners or have a tight corporate relationship—and both have been caught cheating, the law will assume you knew exactly what was going on (Section 2). The bill also gives the government the power to 'deem' companies as affiliated based on things like having the same shippers or similar historical import volumes. For a local business owner, this means you need to be incredibly careful about who your suppliers are; if your partner gets flagged for fraud, your own ability to import could be revoked by the Secretary of Homeland Security under the new rules for the 'importer of record' program.
In a major shift, the bill doesn't just leave enforcement to the government. It creates a 'private right of action,' allowing U.S. manufacturers, unions, and trade associations to sue 'trade cheats' directly in federal court (Section 3). If a domestic company can prove they were financially hurt by a competitor’s customs fraud—perhaps because the competitor used illegal tactics to keep prices artificially low—the court must award triple damages plus attorney’s fees. Imagine a local textile mill or a group of steelworkers seeing their orders drop because a rival is smuggling in cheap materials under the radar; they could now take that rival to court themselves rather than waiting for a federal agency to act.
While the goal is to protect honest U.S. workers and businesses, the bill’s broad definitions could create some messy situations. Because the government can link companies based on 'similarities in imported merchandise' or 'common exporters,' legitimate businesses might find themselves caught in a web of audits or lawsuits just because they use the same overseas shipping hub as a bad actor. For the average office manager or small business owner, this means the 'fine print' of supply chain compliance just became a top-tier priority. The bill essentially turns trade enforcement into a team sport, where competitors are incentivized to police each other, and the cost of a 'paperwork error' could be the end of your importing license.