PolicyBrief
S. 3734
119th CongressJan 29th 2026
Close the Shadow Banking Loophole Act
IN COMMITTEE

This act establishes new federal oversight and restrictions for industrial banks and their parent companies to close regulatory loopholes in the shadow banking system.

John Kennedy
R

John Kennedy

Senator

LA

LEGISLATION

Close the Shadow Banking Loophole Act: New FDIC Oversight and Strict Approval Rules for Industrial Banks to Begin Immediately

Industrial banks have long operated in a unique regulatory space, often owned by commercial companies like retailers or tech firms rather than traditional financial holding companies. This bill, the 'Close the Shadow Banking Loophole Act,' effectively ends that 'business as usual' approach by bringing these institutions under the same kind of microscopic federal scrutiny as the big national banks. It changes the legal definition of a 'bank' to ensure that most industrial loan companies (ILCs) can no longer bypass the strict requirements of the Bank Holding Company Act, unless they were already insured by the FDIC before September 23, 2021, or strictly follow new, tougher rules.

More Eyes on the Parent Company

For years, the 'loophole' meant that while the bank itself was regulated, the parent company owning it—which could be anything from a manufacturing giant to a tech startup—didn't always face the same federal oversight. This bill changes the game by giving the FDIC the power to walk into the offices of these parent companies to examine their books, risk systems, and internal transactions (Section 3). For a tech company that owns a small industrial bank to process its own payments, this means a sudden shift from standard corporate reporting to high-stakes federal banking audits. The FDIC can now impose restrictions on how these companies move money between their commercial side and their banking side to ensure one doesn't sink the other.

Raising the Bar for New Entrants

If a company is currently trying to start a new industrial bank, the finish line just got much further away. For any application pending as of the bill's enactment that was submitted before late 2021, the FDIC is now required to hold public hearings and allow a 90-day window for the public to weigh in (Section 2). Even if the public is on board, the bank needs a two-thirds 'supermajority' vote from the FDIC Board to get the green light. If they don't get that approval by September 30, 2026, the application is automatically denied. This creates a high-pressure environment for startups and non-traditional firms trying to break into the banking sector, potentially slowing down innovation in exchange for what the bill views as increased safety.

Keeping the Keys in Safe Hands

The bill also puts a heavy lock on who can buy or take control of these banks in the future. Generally, the government will now be required to say 'no' to any change in control of an industrial bank unless very specific conditions are met. For example, a sale might only be approved if the bank is in danger of failing and is being bought by a company already supervised by the Federal Reserve (Section 2). This prevents a scenario where a struggling industrial bank is sold to an unregulated private equity firm or a foreign entity without deep federal ties. While this protects the stability of the financial system, it also means that owners of these banks have far fewer options if they ever want to sell their business, potentially locking them into a regulatory structure that is much more demanding than what they originally signed up for.