This bill directs the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a feasibility study for a proposed Missouri River water supply project for Western South Dakota, with cost-sharing between the federal government and the Western Dakota Regional Water System, Inc.
John Thune
Senator
SD
This Act authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a feasibility study for a proposed rural water supply project in Western South Dakota. The study, conducted in partnership with the Western Dakota Regional Water System, Inc., will determine the project's viability and recommend federal authorization for construction. The resulting report must also outline the non-Federal cost share, which must be at least 25% of construction costs.
If you live in Western South Dakota, you know that water isn't just a utility—it’s a lifeline. The Western South Dakota Water Supply Project Feasibility Study Act is the first major step toward a massive infrastructure play: moving water from the Missouri River to the Western Dakota Regional Water System. This isn't a construction bill yet; it’s a formal request for the Secretary of the Interior to figure out if a project of this scale actually works, what it will cost, and who is going to pay for it. The bill authorizes $10 million to get the math right, with the federal government picking up no more than 50% of the study’s tab (Section 3).
The Secretary of the Interior isn't doing this in a vacuum. The bill requires a partnership with the Western Dakota Regional Water System, Inc., a nonprofit entity, along with input from Tribal, state, and local governments. Think of this as the ultimate 'measure twice, cut once' phase. The study will look at the logistics of supplying water for homes, farms, and industrial sites across the region. For a rancher or a small business owner in a dry county, this study is the prerequisite for any long-term stability in water rates and availability. The authority to finish this research lasts for 10 years, so while it’s a priority, the bill allows for a decade of data-gathering before the final report is due (Section 3).
Here’s where the rubber meets the road for taxpayers and local governments: the 'Ability to Pay' analysis. Once the study is done, the Secretary has to recommend how much the local community should chip in for actual construction. The bill sets a hard floor, stating the non-federal share must be at least 25% of the total construction costs (Section 3). For a project that could eventually cost hundreds of millions, that 25% is a significant number that local towns and industrial users will need to account for. The report will specifically look at the community's capacity to handle not just the initial build, but the long-term costs of keeping the pumps running and the pipes maintained.
By the time the report hits the desks of the House and Senate Natural Resources committees, it will include a definitive 'yes' or 'no' on whether the project should move forward. Because the bill requires a deep dive into 'municipal, rural, and industrial' needs, the resulting plan will likely dictate how development looks in Western South Dakota for the next generation. It’s a slow-moving process, but for anyone tired of worrying about well levels or water restrictions during a dry spell, this study is the official starting gun for a more permanent solution.