PolicyBrief
S. 3566
119th CongressDec 18th 2025
No Trade Preferences for Communist China Act
IN COMMITTEE

This bill revokes China's permanent normal trade relations status, subjecting its products to higher, non-market economy tariff rates.

Rick Scott
R

Rick Scott

Senator

FL

LEGISLATION

China Trade Bill Revokes Normal Status, Triggers Massive Tariff Hikes in 90 Days

The “No Trade Preferences for Communist China Act” is a direct and aggressive move to rewrite the rules of U.S.-China trade. Here’s the short version: it cancels the special trade status the U.S. has granted China since 2000, meaning that almost every product imported from China will face dramatically higher tariffs starting 90 days after this bill becomes law.

This isn't about slapping on a few extra fees. When the bill takes effect, Chinese imports will jump from the relatively low tariff rates we currently use (known as Normal Trade Relations, or NTR) to the much higher statutory rates listed in Column 2 of the U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule. These Column 2 rates are, in many cases, punitive and were originally designed for countries with which the U.S. had no established trade relationship. Furthermore, the bill gives the President the authority to proclaim even higher tariffs than those already high Column 2 rates, essentially giving the executive branch maximum leverage—or maximum economic disruption, depending on how you look at it.

The Price Tag on Everything from Tools to Tech

This is the part that hits everyone’s wallet. Right now, U.S. manufacturers, retailers, and consumers rely heavily on Chinese inputs—everything from the microchips in your new laptop to the components in construction equipment and the finished goods on store shelves. When the tariff on a product jumps from, say, 3% to 30%, that cost doesn't just disappear; it gets passed down the supply chain.

For a small business owner who imports specialized tools or apparel components, this change means their cost of goods sold could spike overnight, forcing them to raise prices, absorb the hit (which is tough for small margins), or scramble to find new, non-Chinese suppliers within 90 days. For the rest of us, this translates directly into higher prices for electronics, clothing, furniture, and nearly everything else at the store. The goal here is to protect U.S. manufacturing, but the immediate effect will be felt as significant inflation and supply chain headaches.

Who Gets Caught in the Crossfire?

One critical detail is how the bill defines “People’s Republic of China.” It explicitly includes the governments of mainland China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, and Macau Special Administrative Region. This is a big deal because both Hong Kong and Macau have historically enjoyed different trade treatment than the mainland.

By lumping them in, the bill subjects goods passing through or originating from these regions to the same high tariffs. This removes their separate trade status and could destabilize two major global financial and trading hubs. If you’re a U.S. exporter, you also need to worry about potential retaliation: China is highly likely to respond with its own tariffs on U.S. goods, making it harder and more expensive for American farmers and companies to sell products overseas.

The Rationale: Unfair Play

The bill is grounded in a series of findings that essentially declare China has failed to uphold its end of the trade bargain since receiving NTR status in 2000. Congress cites specific issues like costing the U.S. economy $130 billion in evaded tariffs in 2023, intellectual property theft costing hundreds of billions annually, and failing to meet the purchase commitments laid out in the 2020 U.S.-China trade agreement. They also point to the loss of 5 million U.S. manufacturing jobs since 1994 as evidence that the current trade relationship is unsustainable.

Essentially, the legislative argument is that China’s economic actions and national security threats justify revoking their preferred trade status under international law (specifically citing Article XXI of the GATT 1994, which allows countries to act to protect essential security interests). This bill is the mechanism to execute that argument, but the real-world consequence is a rapid, dramatic increase in the cost of doing business with or buying goods from China.